H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Garbiñe Muguruza vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 1-0
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 1–0 lead over Sílvia Soler-Espinosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2014 Madrid second round 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2014* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(2) | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |