H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Garbiñe Muguruza vs Vania King H2H: 1-0
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2014 Florianopolis third round 6-2 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2014* | Florianopolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |