H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Garbiñe Muguruza vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-4

Venus Williams holds a 4–2 lead over Garbiñe Muguruza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 WTA Finals round-robin match 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Garbiñe Muguruza
ESP Age 32 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 26, 2017 WTA Finals WTA Finals RR Hard Venus Williams #5 7-5 6-4 Garbiñe Muguruza #2 Match data
Jul 16, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Garbiñe Muguruza #15 7-5 6-0 Venus Williams #11 Match data
May 20, 2017* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Garbiñe Muguruza #7 6-2 3-6 6-2 Venus Williams #12 Match data
Oct 4, 2015* Wuhan WTA 1000 F Hard Venus Williams #24 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Garbiñe Muguruza #8 Match data
Jan 4, 2014* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Venus Williams #47 6-3 6-3 Garbiñe Muguruza #63 Match data
Mar 1, 2013* Florianopolis WTA 250 R16 Hard Venus Williams #20 6-4 2-6 7-5 Garbiñe Muguruza #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Garbiñe Muguruza #1,129 #1 6,766 2,067 306 178 63.2% 2 3 1 3 1 10
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Garbiñe Muguruza Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2012 6–8 42.9% #109 1,543 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2013 14–12 53.8% #63 1,669 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2014 38–22 63.3% #20 1,809 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2015 39–19 67.2% #3 1,950 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2016 28–19 59.6% #7 1,837 1 3 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2017 46–19 70.8% #2 1,932 2 5 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2018 36–20 64.3% #18 1,841 2 6 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2019 22–14 61.1% #36 1,814 2 7 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2020 23–8 74.2% #15 1,933 2 7 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2021 42–16 72.4% #3 2,023 2 10 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2022 12–17 41.4% #55 1,783 2 10 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2023 0–4 0.0% #1081 1,729 2 10 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47