H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Agnes Szavay H2H: 2-1
Gisela Dulko holds a 2–1 lead over Agnes Szavay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnes Szavay won the 2010 Montreal second round 6-4 4-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 37
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2010* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Agnes Szavay | 6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2009* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 6-3 6-0 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2007* | Budapest | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 6-2 6-1 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,846 | 116 | 90 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #28 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,784 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |