H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Anastasia Myskina H2H: 1-1
Gisela Dulko and Anastasia Myskina are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2007 Auckland third round 6-1 6-7(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2007* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 6-1 6-7(4) 6-2 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2005 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-4 7-5 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Anastasia Myskina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |