H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Justine Henin H2H: 1-1
Gisela Dulko and Justine Henin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2010 Indian Wells second round 6-2 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-3 6-2 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |