H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 2-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gisela Dulko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2011 Acapulco quarterfinal 3-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2011* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 3-6 7-5 6-0 | Laura Pous-Tio | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2007* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 7-6(2) 7-6(7) | Laura Pous-Tio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Laura Pous-Tio | #776 | #72 | 930 | 1,621 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Laura Pous-Tio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |