H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 0-4
Maria Kirilenko holds a 4–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2010 Beijing third round 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2010* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2007* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-3 6-4 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2006* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2006* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-4 3-0 (ret.) | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 |