H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Giulia Gatto-Monticone vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 0-1
Zarina Diyas holds a 1–0 lead over Giulia Gatto-Monticone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2014 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 38
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2017 | Japan Women's Open Tennis | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-3 6-2 | Giulia Gatto-Monticone | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2014* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-1 6-4 | Giulia Gatto-Monticone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giulia Gatto-Monticone | #1,081 | #148 | 437 | 1,573 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Giulia Gatto-Monticone | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #247 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #188 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |