H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Heather Watson vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 1-1
Heather Watson and Rebecca Marino are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on grass, while Heather Watson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2022 Eastbourne second round 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2025 | Austin | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Rebecca Marino | 6-3 6-4 | Heather Watson | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2022* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Rebecca Marino | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Heather Watson | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2018* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Heather Watson | 6-3 6-4 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Watson | #470 | #38 | 1,386 | 1,755 | 144 | 195 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heather Watson | Rebecca Marino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #49 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #49 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #91 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #269 | 1,545 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |