H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Iga Swiatek vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 3-0
Iga Swiatek holds a 3–0 lead over Rebecca Peterson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Iga Swiatek leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iga Swiatek won the 2023 US Open first round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 25
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Iga Swiatek | 6-0 6-1 | Rebecca Peterson | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Iga Swiatek | 6-2 6-2 | Rebecca Peterson | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Iga Swiatek | 6-1 6-1 | Rebecca Peterson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | #8 | #1 | 11,695 | 2,284 | 322 | 84 | 79.3% | 6 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 25 |
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,863 | 79 | 93 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #60 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 13–5 | 72.2% | #17 | 1,863 | 1 | 1 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #9 | 1,946 | 1 | 3 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 65–9 | 87.8% | #1 | 2,167 | 3 | 11 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 17 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 50–8 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,216 | 5 | 22 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #2 | 2,143 | 6 | 25 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,046 | 6 | 25 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |