H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Irina-Camelia Begu vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 0-1

Richel Hogenkamp holds a 1–0 lead over Irina-Camelia Begu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richel Hogenkamp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richel Hogenkamp won the 2016 Morocco Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Irina-Camelia Begu
Romania Age 36 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Richel Hogenkamp
The Netherlands Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richel Hogenkamp #139 6-3 6-4 Irina-Camelia Begu #35 Match data Apr 27, 2016* R32 Morocco Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Irina-Camelia Begu #461 #22 1,925 1,883 245 237 50.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Richel Hogenkamp #1,297 #94 654 1,581 14 28 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Irina-Camelia Begu Richel Hogenkamp
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #202 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 16–11 59.3% #40 1,657 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #197 1,513 0 0
21 2012 22–19 53.7% #52 1,728 0 1 2013 2–2 50.0% #213 1,524 0 0
22 2013 10–17 37.0% #131 1,558 0 1 2014 1–1 50.0% #138 1,530 0 0
23 2014 14–15 48.3% #41 1,617 0 1 2015 2–7 22.2% #132 1,495 0 0
24 2015 30–20 60.0% #31 1,698 0 2 2016 3–3 50.0% #133 1,548 0 0
25 2016 25–20 55.6% #29 1,682 0 3 2017 5–8 38.5% #106 1,537 0 0
26 2017 20–22 47.6% #43 1,663 0 4 2018 0–5 0.0% #167 1,514 0 0
27 2018 19–25 43.2% #67 1,592 0 4 2019 0–1 0.0% #195 1,478 0 0
28 2019 11–15 42.3% #102 1,560 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2020 5–8 38.5% #78 1,712 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2021 17–15 53.1% #62 1,738 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2022 25–15 62.5% #34 1,832 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2023 13–13 50.0% #75 1,776 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2024 10–8 55.6% #79 1,803 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2025 7–9 43.8% #144 1,758 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2026 1–3 25.0% #461 1,725 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Irina-Camelia Begu Richel Hogenkamp
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 5 5 10 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2012 11 7 18 61.1% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2013 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2015 15 11 26 57.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2016 11 12 23 47.8% 13 5 18 72.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2018 10 16 26 38.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2019 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 0 4 4 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 107 129 236 45.3% 124 85 209 59.3% 14 23 37 37.8% — 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 446/482 of Irina-Camelia Begu's and 40/42 of Richel Hogenkamp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Irina-Camelia Begu Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 1/1 1.0 6.0 65.5% 50.0% 43.6% 50.0% 62.5% 47.8% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1/1 0.0 4.0 69.8% 56.7% 15.4% 28.6% 0.0% 44.2% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 25/27 2.4 3.8 59.5% 61.9% 44.4% 50.6% 45.4% 54.7% 45.7% 2012 2/2 2.0 8.5 48.8% 65.9% 48.9% 56.3% 43.2% 57.0% 36.8%
21 2012 37/41 2.2 3.4 66.2% 59.6% 45.3% 48.2% 50.8% 55.0% 43.8% 2013 3/4 1.0 6.3 57.2% 55.4% 46.8% 57.9% 78.0% 52.0% 45.5%
22 2013 25/27 1.8 5.3 61.0% 58.2% 38.3% 51.4% 46.8% 50.4% 43.5% 2014 2/2 1.5 5.5 64.9% 56.6% 37.3% 55.0% 65.3% 50.3% 48.5%
23 2014 27/29 2.5 3.3 62.7% 62.2% 46.4% 48.9% 47.6% 56.1% 43.1% 2015 8/9 0.9 3.1 59.2% 60.5% 48.0% 55.2% 51.4% 55.8% 34.4%
24 2015 38/50 2.7 3.8 65.1% 64.1% 50.2% 52.0% 58.6% 59.1% 42.3% 2016 6/6 0.8 4.8 55.6% 63.8% 49.0% 61.8% 57.0% 57.1% 45.2%
25 2016 42/45 3.6 4.4 61.2% 63.7% 45.3% 54.4% 49.3% 56.6% 43.1% 2017 13/13 1.8 2.9 59.1% 62.5% 49.4% 47.9% 42.7% 57.2% 39.2%
26 2017 41/42 2.2 4.6 63.5% 61.6% 46.0% 54.5% 52.8% 55.8% 44.4% 2018 5/5 1.0 4.0 55.4% 55.2% 40.6% 47.6% 31.3% 48.4% 34.0%
27 2018 43/44 1.8 4.5 63.4% 59.3% 42.0% 50.4% 50.5% 53.0% 42.8% 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 61.5% 54.2% 43.3% 50.0% 42.9% 50.0% 43.3%
28 2019 26/26 1.7 4.3 63.2% 61.8% 47.1% 46.3% 53.2% 56.5% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 13/13 1.3 4.0 67.6% 58.9% 45.8% 46.5% 47.1% 54.9% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 32/32 2.8 3.8 64.2% 63.9% 43.4% 50.0% 42.1% 56.6% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 39/40 3.3 4.6 64.0% 66.2% 46.4% 49.0% 43.8% 59.0% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 26/26 2.6 4.2 65.6% 63.6% 45.5% 55.2% 48.0% 57.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 17/18 1.8 2.7 67.5% 63.9% 46.2% 59.5% 51.3% 58.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 9/16 1.7 4.2 62.5% 59.1% 43.6% 41.9% 49.2% 53.2% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 4/4 2.8 3.0 69.3% 53.1% 38.8% 33.0% 35.4% 48.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 446/482 2.4 4.1 63.7% 62.0% 45.0% 50.8% 49.2% 55.9% 43.3% — 40/42 1.3 4.1 57.8% 60.5% 47.0% 53.0% 49.0% 54.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Irina-Camelia Begu Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2009 1493 101.8 +1.68 +0.59 0.849 46.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1486 95.9 -0.38 -2.74 0.512 36.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1657 128.9 +0.21 +1.84 1.010 50.2% -80 +48 — 61.4% +0.35 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -1.11 2012 1513 105.3 +0.72 -1.37 0.857 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — -0.17
21 2012 1729 124.4 -0.08 -0.14 0.972 49.4% -44 -4 -163 50.5% -0.14 8–5 (62%) 6–5 (55%) 105.0 -1.47 2013 1525 101.1 -1.26 -0.60 0.947 49.5% — +62 — 44.4% -0.45 1–0 — — +0.05
22 2013 1559 109.9 -4.05 -1.09 0.877 47.2% +38 +77 -50 39.3% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.9 +0.92 2014 1530 104.8 -1.97 -1.72 0.975 49.3% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
23 2014 1617 119.9 -0.25 -1.13 0.983 49.6% -23 +30 — 53.0% +0.03 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 +1.11 2015 1496 108.3 -1.68 -2.17 0.778 45.4% -26 +70 — 26.3% -1.68 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.22
24 2015 1698 131.5 +1.34 +0.89 1.034 50.9% -37 +30 -116 57.4% +0.44 9–10 (47%) 8–8 (50%) 100.3 +2.64 2016 1549 112.0 -0.08 +0.20 1.052 51.5% — — — 57.1% +0.50 0–2 — — -0.05
25 2016 1682 126.6 +0.58 +0.63 0.991 50.0% -72 +175 -137 52.4% 0.00 14–6 (70%) 7–2 (78%) 107.7 +0.64 2017 1538 106.6 +0.40 -2.44 0.917 48.4% -45 — +57 39.3% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.12
26 2017 1664 128.6 -0.38 +1.07 1.004 49.9% -89 +195 — 47.0% -0.15 9–7 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 99.2 +1.03 2018 1514 95.9 -2.74 -3.00 0.659 41.5% — +56 — 9.1% -3.36 0–1 0–2 — -0.20
27 2018 1593 124.2 -2.95 -0.51 0.911 48.0% -36 +204 — 43.9% -0.57 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 102.2 +0.57 2019 1479 104.6 +0.93 +3.09 0.867 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
28 2019 1560 121.8 -0.13 +0.23 1.021 50.4% -4 +132 — 45.0% -0.18 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 95.8 +0.93 2020 1482 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 1712 131.3 +0.09 -0.90 0.898 47.5% -48 +81 — 34.5% -0.65 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1739 138.8 +0.20 -0.34 0.975 49.3% +5 -16 -180 50.7% +0.12 6–3 (67%) 7–9 (44%) 102.9 -1.63 2022 1468 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1832 139.8 +1.77 +0.58 1.060 51.1% -93 +130 -232 58.5% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 101.6 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1777 132.8 +0.02 +1.18 1.021 50.3% -86 +140 — 50.8% -0.05 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 99.8 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1803 131.2 +1.25 +2.03 1.090 51.8% -132 +166 — 52.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1758 125.4 -2.22 -2.60 0.853 46.5% -101 +159 — 45.0% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1726 103.3 -3.12 -1.52 0.666 41.4% — — -74 22.2% -2.11 1–0 1–0 — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 134.3 -0.24 +0.24 0.980 49.5% -45 +108 -136 50.1% -0.07 89–73 (55%) 58–55 (51%) 104.7 +0.87 — 1581 108.2 -0.69 -1.69 0.874 47.4% -39 +63 +57 35.9% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 0–8 (0%) 92.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.