H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Anett Kontaveit holds a 1–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2017 Guangzhou Open first round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | 6-0 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Sep 20, 2017* | R32 | Guangzhou Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #21 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 176 | 138 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,114 | 205 | 140 | 59.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,058 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,886 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,779 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #21 | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% |
| 22 | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2021 | 40 | 13 | 53 | 75.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 2022 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2023 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 104 | 81 | 185 | 56.2% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 139 | 91 | 230 | 60.4% | 46 | 33 | 79 | 58.2% | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 327/346 of Anett Kontaveit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 60.7% | 43.2% | 37.5% | 53.8% | 100.0% | 41.0% | 34.2% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5/6 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 60.9% | 61.7% | 40.9% | 41.7% | 44.7% | 53.1% | 43.9% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5/11 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 57.9% | 51.5% | 44.8% | 28.1% | 34.6% | 48.4% | 40.1% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 29/30 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 58.9% | 66.1% | 45.4% | 54.5% | 51.5% | 57.6% | 42.4% |
| 21 | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 63.0% | 0.0% | 40.4% | 28.4% | 2017 | 45/45 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 64.0% | 68.8% | 48.4% | 54.2% | 44.0% | 61.4% | 44.3% |
| 22 | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 52.3% | 45.2% | 51.3% | 50.3% | 50.2% | 43.5% | 2018 | 55/56 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 62.3% | 63.8% | 46.6% | 57.8% | 51.1% | 57.4% | 44.9% |
| 23 | 2019 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 66.2% | 56.5% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 2019 | 38/42 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 63.1% | 66.8% | 48.3% | 61.3% | 45.3% | 59.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2020 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 54.1% | 41.6% | 49.3% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 47.1% | 2020 | 31/31 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 62.2% | 67.6% | 48.2% | 53.1% | 53.1% | 60.2% | 45.4% |
| 25 | 2021 | 38/39 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 59.5% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 49.1% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 2021 | 61/67 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 60.7% | 69.7% | 50.2% | 56.4% | 53.2% | 62.2% | 45.8% |
| 26 | 2022 | 40/42 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.5% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 49.7% | 55.4% | 43.9% | 2022 | 45/45 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 63.2% | 66.5% | 47.4% | 54.5% | 47.5% | 59.6% | 44.4% |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/48 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 59.0% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 55.7% | 43.5% | 2023 | 12/12 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 62.4% | 64.4% | 43.0% | 46.1% | 37.2% | 56.3% | 40.1% |
| 28 | 2024 | 53/59 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 63.6% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 58.5% | 45.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 51/61 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.0% | 49.2% | 57.9% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 27/29 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 67.8% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.9% | 46.2% | 56.5% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 293/315 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 67.2% | 60.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 48.5% | 55.9% | 44.3% | — | 327/346 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 62.0% | 66.6% | 47.6% | 55.1% | 48.9% | 59.4% | 44.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1491 | 98.3 | -2.83 | -0.54 | 0.580 | 38.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1466 | 100.3 | -0.85 | +0.51 | 0.936 | 48.5% | — | +74 | — | 28.6% | -1.21 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.11 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1517 | 109.4 | -3.04 | -1.00 | 0.776 | 44.4% | +23 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1607 | 127.5 | +1.62 | -0.14 | 1.002 | 50.4% | -2 | -120 | -30 | 50.0% | +0.26 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–7 (30%) | 93.8 | -2.22 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 | 2017 | 1706 | 137.6 | +4.48 | +1.12 | 1.147 | 52.5% | -91 | +30 | +30 | 56.2% | +0.75 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–9 (44%) | 101.7 | -0.81 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2018 | 1837 | 141.9 | +0.78 | +2.24 | 1.053 | 51.3% | -76 | +49 | -138 | 53.4% | +0.30 | 15–8 (65%) | 10–5 (67%) | 110.5 | +1.22 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | 2019 | 1876 | 145.7 | +2.85 | +1.08 | 1.066 | 51.5% | +36 | -18 | -176 | 51.8% | +0.09 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | -0.95 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 | 2020 | 1871 | 153.1 | +2.99 | +1.93 | 1.143 | 52.9% | +44 | -8 | — | 61.6% | +1.01 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.31 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.2 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 | 2021 | 2058 | 162.0 | +5.54 | +3.36 | 1.211 | 54.0% | +27 | -175 | -286 | 69.2% | +1.24 | 10–7 (59%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.7 | -1.91 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 | 2022 | 1886 | 151.2 | +2.51 | +1.53 | 1.100 | 52.0% | +86 | +5 | — | 61.2% | +0.68 | 8–6 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.1 | +0.40 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 | 2023 | 1779 | 114.3 | -0.99 | -1.11 | 0.919 | 48.2% | +118 | +17 | — | 40.0% | -0.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -13 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 2004 | 161.4 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -162 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1891 | 138.3 | -0.19 | +0.80 | 1.021 | 50.6% | +23 | +89 | +18 | 50.7% | +0.16 | 9–4 (69%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.0 | +2.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2056 | 144.8 | -0.10 | +1.43 | 1.005 | 50.3% | -26 | +27 | -129 | 52.4% | +0.10 | 65–40 (62%) | 33–28 (54%) | 112.0 | +0.46 | — | 2114 | 150.2 | +2.78 | +1.61 | 1.089 | 51.8% | +11 | -6 | -112 | 56.8% | +0.53 | 61–49 (55%) | 42–39 (52%) | 103.2 | -1.15 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Feb 13, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 19, 2022 | H2H |