H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Anna Kalinskaya H2H: 3-1
Jasmine Paolini holds a 3–1 lead over Anna Kalinskaya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 Indian Wells third round 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2024* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2024* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-4 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2021* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-2 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anna Kalinskaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |