H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Jasmine Paolini holds a 3–1 lead over Anna Kalinskaya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 Indian Wells Open third round 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data | Mar 11, 2024* | R32 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jasmine Paolini | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data | Feb 24, 2024* | F | Dubai Tennis Championships | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 6-4 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Jan 23, 2024* | R16 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-2 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data | Sep 17, 2021* | R16 | Portoroz | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #21 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 176 | 138 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Anna Kalinskaya | #23 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,956 | 141 | 127 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anna Kalinskaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,930 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #21 | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anna Kalinskaya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2024 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% |
| 26 | 2022 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2025 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2026 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 104 | 81 | 185 | 56.2% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 102 | 83 | 185 | 55.1% | 26 | 28 | 54 | 48.1% | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 253/268 of Anna Kalinskaya's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anna Kalinskaya | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9/9 | 1.4 | 4.1 | 62.4% | 62.9% | 42.7% | 36.2% | 35.2% | 55.6% | 42.0% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8/8 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 61.1% | 51.5% | 38.3% | 40.8% | 23.9% | 46.6% | 37.7% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14/14 | 1.6 | 4.3 | 60.3% | 61.3% | 43.6% | 54.5% | 43.2% | 54.2% | 40.1% |
| 21 | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 63.0% | 0.0% | 40.4% | 28.4% | 2020 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 64.7% | 56.7% | 46.6% | 45.0% | 60.5% | 53.3% | 33.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 52.3% | 45.2% | 51.3% | 50.3% | 50.2% | 43.5% | 2021 | 26/26 | 1.2 | 4.0 | 63.4% | 58.7% | 47.2% | 49.6% | 40.3% | 54.7% | 40.6% |
| 23 | 2019 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 66.2% | 56.5% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 2022 | 31/32 | 1.5 | 4.6 | 61.5% | 64.1% | 44.9% | 56.9% | 42.0% | 56.6% | 41.7% |
| 24 | 2020 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 54.1% | 41.6% | 49.3% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 47.1% | 2023 | 29/29 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 64.7% | 64.6% | 46.1% | 53.5% | 55.6% | 57.9% | 44.3% |
| 25 | 2021 | 38/39 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 59.5% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 49.1% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 2024 | 50/52 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 66.6% | 64.1% | 49.7% | 57.5% | 48.7% | 59.2% | 45.2% |
| 26 | 2022 | 40/42 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.5% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 49.7% | 55.4% | 43.9% | 2025 | 36/46 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 64.8% | 64.7% | 46.0% | 52.4% | 47.9% | 58.4% | 41.3% |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/48 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 59.0% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 55.7% | 43.5% | 2026 | 43/45 | 2.3 | 4.5 | 61.5% | 64.0% | 46.6% | 47.7% | 51.8% | 57.0% | 44.5% |
| 28 | 2024 | 53/59 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 63.6% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 58.5% | 45.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 51/61 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.0% | 49.2% | 57.9% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 27/29 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 67.8% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.9% | 46.2% | 56.5% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 293/315 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 67.2% | 60.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 48.5% | 55.9% | 44.3% | — | 253/269 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 63.6% | 62.9% | 46.4% | 52.0% | 47.0% | 56.8% | 42.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anna Kalinskaya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1480 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1530 | 103.2 | -0.33 | -0.89 | 0.947 | 48.2% | -31 | +19 | — | 35.0% | -0.65 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.05 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1462 | 106.4 | -4.83 | -2.18 | 0.705 | 42.3% | -30 | +83 | — | 11.1% | -2.89 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.33 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1599 | 113.0 | -1.49 | -2.24 | 0.876 | 47.3% | -7 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.70 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | +0.73 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 | 2020 | 1598 | 114.2 | -1.46 | -3.46 | 0.706 | 43.4% | +5 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2021 | 1726 | 126.0 | -0.98 | -2.00 | 0.896 | 47.8% | +26 | -238 | — | 48.3% | -0.37 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 102.5 | -0.36 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | 2022 | 1811 | 133.4 | +0.35 | -0.59 | 0.961 | 49.2% | +71 | -374 | -298 | 59.0% | +0.10 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–1 (86%) | 105.8 | -1.11 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 | 2023 | 1820 | 137.4 | +0.79 | +1.49 | 1.053 | 51.1% | -14 | -185 | — | 59.7% | +0.40 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–1 (86%) | 102.3 | -1.35 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.2 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 | 2024 | 1894 | 153.5 | +2.49 | +2.47 | 1.109 | 52.2% | +28 | -284 | -109 | 62.2% | +0.85 | 10–9 (53%) | 7–6 (54%) | 101.5 | +0.71 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 | 2025 | 1888 | 147.6 | +1.57 | -0.62 | 0.993 | 49.9% | +7 | -198 | — | 51.9% | +0.12 | 10–4 (71%) | 11–5 (69%) | 109.3 | -1.32 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 | 2026 | 1930 | 152.9 | +0.95 | +1.73 | 1.035 | 50.5% | +3 | -106 | -172 | 56.6% | +0.15 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–4 (69%) | 108.0 | -0.32 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -13 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 2004 | 161.4 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -162 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1891 | 138.3 | -0.19 | +0.81 | 1.021 | 50.6% | +23 | +89 | +18 | 50.7% | +0.16 | 9–4 (69%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.0 | +2.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2056 | 144.8 | -0.10 | +1.43 | 1.005 | 50.3% | -26 | +27 | -129 | 52.4% | +0.10 | 65–40 (62%) | 33–28 (54%) | 112.0 | +0.46 | — | 1957 | 142.5 | +0.62 | +0.27 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +16 | -172 | -175 | 52.7% | +0.02 | 52–42 (55%) | 45–23 (66%) | 114.3 | -1.26 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jul 31, 2026 | H2H |
| Belinda Bencic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jul 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 11, 2026 | H2H |