H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Beatriz Haddad Maia H2H: 3-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 3–0 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Bad Homburg quarterfinal 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Jasmine Paolini | 7-5 7-5 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2024* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2023 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Beatriz Haddad Maia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 |