H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jasmine Paolini vs Belinda Bencic H2H: 1-0

Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Belinda Bencic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Ningbo Open quarterfinal 5-7 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jasmine Paolini
Italy Age 30 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Belinda Bencic
Switzerland Age 29 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jasmine Paolini #8 5-7 7-5 6-3 Belinda Bencic #14 Match data Oct 17, 2025 QF Ningbo Open WTA 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jasmine Paolini #21 #4 5,865 2,056 176 138 56.1% 0 0 2 0 0 1 3
Belinda Bencic #12 #4 4,745 2,035 310 192 61.8% 0 1 2 0 7 0 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jasmine Paolini Belinda Bencic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #612 1,498 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2013 2–3 40.0% #184 1,512 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2014 18–17 51.4% #32 1,687 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2015 40–21 65.6% #14 1,916 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 2016 18–21 46.2% #43 1,682 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 2017 3–8 27.3% #98 1,684 0 2
21 2017 0–2 0.0% #140 1,453 0 0 2018 14–14 50.0% #54 1,719 0 2
22 2018 3–5 37.5% #192 1,498 0 0 2019 48–21 69.6% #8 1,919 0 4
23 2019 6–9 40.0% #96 1,586 0 0 2020 7–7 50.0% #12 1,848 0 4
24 2020 4–8 33.3% #96 1,550 0 0 2021 34–19 64.2% #23 1,902 0 5
25 2021 20–19 51.3% #53 1,769 0 1 2022 38–19 66.7% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2022 22–20 52.4% #62 1,741 0 1 2023 31–13 70.5% #17 1,925 0 8
27 2023 25–23 52.1% #30 1,847 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2024 40–19 67.8% #4 1,973 0 2 2025 36–16 69.2% #11 2,004 0 10
29 2025 40–20 66.7% #8 2,003 0 3 2026 21–12 63.6% #12 1,973 0 10
30 2026 16–13 55.2% #21 1,891 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jasmine Paolini Belinda Bencic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 9 19 52.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 23 12 35 65.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 14 3 17 82.4%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 16 30 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2019 30 12 42 71.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 2019 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2020 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2021 24 11 35 68.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2021 17 13 30 56.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 19 12 31 61.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2023 24 10 34 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2023 19 15 34 55.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2024 20 12 32 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2025 28 11 39 71.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
29 2025 24 14 38 63.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2026 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2026 9 7 16 56.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 57 45 102 55.9% 15 12 27 55.6% — 203 128 331 61.3% 53 39 92 57.6% 54 25 79 68.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 447/506 of Belinda Bencic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jasmine Paolini Belinda Bencic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 1.0 2.0 60.0% 56.7% 25.0% 58.3% 33.3% 44.0% 37.3%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 2.8 4.6 57.6% 63.2% 44.7% 31.0% 45.6% 55.2% 44.5%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 30/35 2.7 3.4 58.2% 63.1% 42.2% 47.6% 46.5% 54.5% 44.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 50/61 2.1 3.0 66.1% 65.0% 50.9% 49.8% 46.0% 60.1% 42.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 35/39 2.2 4.9 60.9% 65.0% 43.9% 55.0% 39.1% 56.6% 39.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 11/12 2.4 4.7 59.2% 64.6% 40.9% 52.1% 53.3% 55.3% 38.8%
21 2017 2/2 0.0 3.0 57.7% 43.8% 38.8% 63.0% 0.0% 40.4% 28.4% 2018 25/28 2.9 4.0 63.8% 64.7% 43.4% 54.8% 47.8% 57.2% 43.1%
22 2018 8/8 0.4 1.6 66.1% 52.3% 45.2% 51.3% 50.3% 50.2% 43.5% 2019 64/69 3.0 4.8 62.0% 68.6% 46.9% 51.4% 47.6% 60.3% 45.5%
23 2019 15/15 0.7 3.2 66.2% 56.5% 45.9% 54.7% 50.4% 52.8% 41.7% 2020 14/14 3.5 5.4 60.4% 65.1% 40.4% 47.6% 53.4% 55.5% 39.5%
24 2020 12/12 0.7 2.9 63.6% 54.1% 41.6% 49.3% 44.2% 49.7% 47.1% 2021 45/53 3.8 5.1 59.8% 70.6% 47.5% 57.7% 44.0% 61.4% 41.2%
25 2021 38/39 0.9 2.5 66.3% 59.5% 45.8% 55.3% 49.1% 54.9% 43.2% 2022 56/57 3.5 4.3 63.2% 70.8% 49.0% 62.0% 48.2% 62.7% 43.6%
26 2022 40/42 0.8 2.3 66.5% 59.5% 46.8% 53.2% 49.7% 55.4% 43.9% 2023 42/44 3.1 4.2 60.7% 70.3% 52.4% 54.1% 53.3% 63.2% 44.6%
27 2023 47/48 0.9 1.8 68.3% 59.0% 48.4% 51.4% 45.2% 55.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2024 53/59 1.3 1.8 67.8% 63.6% 47.8% 52.9% 52.6% 58.5% 45.8% 2025 39/54 1.9 2.9 64.8% 67.0% 46.4% 55.6% 49.4% 59.7% 43.1%
29 2025 51/61 1.3 1.5 68.1% 62.2% 49.5% 52.0% 49.2% 57.9% 45.7% 2026 30/34 2.0 3.5 63.6% 67.9% 51.1% 61.4% 53.9% 62.0% 47.5%
30 2026 27/29 1.6 2.0 67.8% 60.6% 49.2% 58.9% 46.2% 56.5% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 293/315 1.1 2.0 67.2% 60.1% 47.4% 53.4% 48.5% 55.9% 44.3% — 447/506 2.8 4.1 62.2% 67.5% 47.2% 54.4% 47.8% 59.8% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jasmine Paolini Belinda Bencic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1498 109.0 +0.38 +1.75 0.665 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.32
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1512 112.4 -1.40 -1.46 0.993 49.7% +35 — — 41.7% -0.08 1–1 — — +0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1687 133.0 -1.06 +0.66 0.968 49.4% -36 -88 -56 46.8% -0.19 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 103.6 -0.45
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1917 142.9 +1.98 +1.43 1.055 50.8% -43 -371 -32 61.7% +0.71 13–5 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 110.5 +0.12
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1682 132.7 +0.67 -2.42 0.916 48.4% +13 — +122 50.6% +0.01 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 98.8 +0.39
20 2016 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1684 116.5 +0.34 -2.98 0.868 47.5% +4 — — 33.3% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.56
21 2017 1454 95.0 -0.81 -0.44 0.476 36.0% — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.39 2018 1720 131.9 +0.41 +0.77 1.005 50.1% -15 — +137 50.8% -0.14 4–7 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 98.4 -0.88
22 2018 1499 110.7 -1.60 -1.28 0.874 47.0% — +21 — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 2019 1919 153.4 +3.67 +3.33 1.146 52.8% +7 -198 -22 63.7% +0.75 19–10 (66%) 11–3 (79%) 113.3 -0.19
23 2019 1587 114.9 -2.75 -0.55 0.884 47.2% -71 +39 — 37.1% -1.12 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.63 2020 1849 132.9 -0.10 -2.02 0.889 47.8% +28 — — 53.1% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 98.8 +0.36
24 2020 1550 117.8 -2.87 +2.21 0.937 48.4% -99 +114 — 33.3% -0.85 2–1 (67%) — — -0.53 2021 1903 145.9 +4.09 -0.65 1.068 51.2% +31 -180 +37 57.6% +0.47 12–4 (75%) 8–1 (89%) 110.4 +2.66
25 2021 1770 130.2 -1.17 -0.08 0.958 49.4% -55 -35 — 47.8% -0.30 9–5 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 110.2 -0.03 2022 1908 148.8 +4.85 +1.47 1.169 52.9% +16 -43 +29 62.3% +0.89 16–10 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 99.1 -0.23
26 2022 1742 131.6 -1.55 +0.45 0.984 49.9% -12 +2 — 50.5% +0.13 11–10 (52%) 2–7 (22%) 98.4 -0.51 2023 1926 154.5 +5.48 +2.15 1.211 53.6% +23 -57 +17 65.6% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 9–5 (64%) 102.7 +0.65
27 2023 1848 138.9 -0.40 +0.93 0.981 49.6% -23 -12 -324 47.7% -0.21 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 106.5 -1.68 2024 1909 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2024 1973 157.6 +2.06 +3.44 1.105 52.2% -50 -13 -140 63.3% +0.79 9–9 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 105.7 +0.64 2025 2004 160.1 +2.92 +0.83 1.069 51.4% +49 -160 +82 62.8% +0.71 14–6 (70%) 10–6 (63%) 106.3 -1.96
29 2025 2004 161.4 +1.61 +2.90 1.085 52.0% -5 +75 -162 62.5% +0.68 11–5 (69%) 8–5 (62%) 106.8 +1.91 2026 1974 156.2 +4.56 +3.87 1.249 54.5% +39 -54 +88 66.7% +1.17 4–8 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 94.0 +0.87
30 2026 1891 138.3 -0.19 +0.80 1.021 50.6% +23 +89 +18 50.7% +0.16 9–4 (69%) 1–5 (17%) 99.0 +2.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2056 144.8 -0.10 +1.43 1.005 50.3% -26 +27 -129 52.4% +0.10 65–40 (62%) 33–28 (54%) 112.0 +0.46 — 2036 153.4 +2.84 +1.04 1.075 51.4% +11 -139 +28 58.8% +0.52 110–70 (61%) 78–48 (62%) 110.9 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.