H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Belinda Bencic H2H: 1-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Belinda Bencic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Ningbo quarterfinal 5-7 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2025 | Ningbo | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Belinda Bencic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |