H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jasmine Paolini vs Daria Saville H2H: 1-1

Jasmine Paolini and Daria Saville are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jasmine Paolini
Italy Age 30 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Daria Saville
Australia Age 32 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jasmine Paolini #15 6-3 6-4 Daria Saville #84 Match data May 28, 2024* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Daria Saville #225 6-0 7-6(3) Jasmine Paolini #47 Match data Jul 26, 2023* R32 Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jasmine Paolini #21 #4 5,865 2,056 176 138 56.1% 0 2 0 0 1 3
Daria Saville #226 #20 2,135 1,858 159 156 50.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jasmine Paolini Daria Saville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #539 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–1 50.0% #226 1,508 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 2–6 25.0% #149 1,462 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 1–1 50.0% #233 1,483 0 0
21 2017 0–2 0.0% #140 1,453 0 0 2015 20–21 48.8% #36 1,675 0 0
22 2018 3–5 37.5% #192 1,498 0 0 2016 27–20 57.4% #25 1,836 0 0
23 2019 6–9 40.0% #96 1,586 0 0 2017 33–22 60.0% #25 1,794 0 1
24 2020 4–8 33.3% #96 1,550 0 0 2018 27–23 54.0% #35 1,781 0 1
25 2021 20–19 51.3% #53 1,769 0 1 2019 6–16 27.3% #242 1,603 0 1
26 2022 22–20 52.4% #62 1,741 0 1 2020 1–1 50.0% #450 1,617 0 1
27 2023 25–23 52.1% #30 1,847 0 1 2021 2–2 50.0% #419 1,645 0 1
28 2024 40–19 67.8% #4 1,973 0 2 2022 19–15 55.9% #53 1,738 0 1
29 2025 40–20 66.7% #8 2,003 0 3 2023 6–8 42.9% #204 1,686 0 1
30 2026 16–13 55.2% #21 1,891 0 3 2024 11–14 44.0% #108 1,667 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2025 3–5 37.5% #197 1,661 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jasmine Paolini Daria Saville
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 13 17 30 43.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2019 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2021 17 13 30 56.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2023 19 15 34 55.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2024 20 12 32 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2022 16 10 26 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2025 24 14 38 63.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2023 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2026 9 7 16 56.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 2024 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 57 45 102 55.9% 15 12 27 55.6% — 105 101 206 51.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 15 21 36 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 287/316 of Daria Saville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jasmine Paolini Daria Saville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 5.0 4.0 46.6% 59.3% 38.7% 44.4% 33.3% 48.3% 32.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 4.0 3.0 63.0% 65.8% 46.5% 33.3% 60.0% 58.2% 55.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/8 2.9 6.5 55.6% 56.5% 36.1% 47.6% 53.1% 47.6% 40.4%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/2 2.5 6.0 61.7% 57.5% 39.0% 39.8% 50.0% 50.3% 47.0%
21 2017 2/2 0.0 3.0 57.7% 43.8% 38.8% 63.0% 0.0% 40.4% 28.4% 2015 31/41 2.5 4.6 66.2% 62.3% 49.2% 54.6% 52.2% 57.6% 41.8%
22 2018 8/8 0.4 1.6 66.1% 52.3% 45.2% 51.3% 50.3% 50.2% 43.5% 2016 37/47 1.9 3.9 63.1% 62.0% 47.1% 52.1% 44.7% 56.5% 44.0%
23 2019 15/15 0.7 3.2 66.2% 56.5% 45.9% 54.7% 50.4% 52.8% 41.7% 2017 54/55 2.7 4.8 62.9% 64.0% 45.6% 46.7% 50.8% 57.1% 45.6%
24 2020 12/12 0.7 2.9 63.6% 54.1% 41.6% 49.3% 44.2% 49.7% 47.1% 2018 48/51 1.8 7.7 65.7% 62.8% 37.3% 53.1% 51.4% 54.1% 45.5%
25 2021 38/39 0.9 2.5 66.3% 59.5% 45.8% 55.3% 49.1% 54.9% 43.2% 2019 21/22 1.0 4.2 66.4% 56.8% 43.9% 45.7% 46.5% 52.4% 41.3%
26 2022 40/42 0.8 2.3 66.5% 59.5% 46.8% 53.2% 49.7% 55.4% 43.9% 2020 2/2 0.5 5.0 59.8% 62.1% 52.1% 75.0% 73.2% 58.6% 43.5%
27 2023 47/48 0.9 1.8 68.3% 59.0% 48.4% 51.4% 45.2% 55.7% 43.5% 2021 4/4 2.0 4.0 57.5% 66.2% 46.6% 52.5% 44.5% 57.9% 47.1%
28 2024 53/59 1.3 1.8 67.8% 63.6% 47.8% 52.9% 52.6% 58.5% 45.8% 2022 33/34 2.2 5.0 64.1% 64.5% 44.3% 58.4% 45.6% 57.5% 44.2%
29 2025 51/61 1.3 1.5 68.1% 62.2% 49.5% 52.0% 49.2% 57.9% 45.7% 2023 14/14 1.3 4.8 63.7% 61.1% 38.3% 45.4% 53.3% 53.3% 45.8%
30 2026 27/29 1.6 2.0 67.8% 60.6% 49.2% 58.9% 46.2% 56.5% 44.4% 2024 25/25 2.1 6.2 67.4% 57.8% 41.9% 59.3% 57.6% 52.5% 45.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 5/8 1.0 5.0 69.5% 56.9% 39.9% 48.9% 60.2% 51.1% 40.2%
Career — 293/315 1.1 2.0 67.2% 60.1% 47.4% 53.4% 48.5% 55.9% 44.3% — 287/316 2.1 5.3 64.3% 61.8% 43.5% 51.8% 50.3% 55.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jasmine Paolini Daria Saville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1494 101.6 +1.65 -1.80 0.633 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1508 107.7 +0.29 +3.39 1.317 57.0% — — — 50.0% +1.50 — 0–1 — -0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1462 101.0 -2.47 -1.24 0.771 44.0% +3 — — 26.3% -1.63 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.05
20 2016 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1483 109.1 +0.25 +0.24 0.946 48.8% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
21 2017 1454 95.0 -0.81 -0.44 0.476 36.0% — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.39 2015 1675 139.1 +0.59 +1.21 0.985 50.0% -73 -34 -29 50.0% -0.05 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 106.8 -1.55
22 2018 1499 110.7 -1.60 -1.28 0.874 47.0% — +21 — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 2016 1837 143.7 +0.70 +1.71 1.011 50.3% -38 -114 -194 54.4% +0.28 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 -1.91
23 2019 1587 114.9 -2.75 -0.55 0.884 47.2% -71 +39 — 37.1% -1.12 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.63 2017 1795 139.8 +0.45 +2.93 1.061 51.3% +20 -6 -173 57.7% +0.43 14–13 (52%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 +1.08
24 2020 1550 117.8 -2.87 +2.21 0.937 48.4% -99 +114 — 33.3% -0.85 2–1 (67%) — — -0.53 2018 1781 141.0 -2.19 +2.60 0.991 49.8% +14 0 -108 52.2% -0.08 11–8 (58%) 13–1 (93%) 108.4 -0.58
25 2021 1770 130.2 -1.17 -0.08 0.958 49.4% -55 -35 — 47.8% -0.30 9–5 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 110.2 -0.03 2019 1604 107.6 -2.88 -1.35 0.868 46.7% +84 +22 +39 27.7% -1.28 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 -0.63
26 2022 1742 131.6 -1.55 +0.45 0.984 49.9% -12 +2 — 50.5% +0.13 11–10 (52%) 2–7 (22%) 98.4 -0.51 2020 1617 108.7 +0.59 +1.52 1.052 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.14
27 2023 1848 138.9 -0.40 +0.93 0.981 49.6% -23 -12 -324 47.7% -0.21 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 106.5 -1.68 2021 1646 128.1 +1.67 +2.64 1.117 52.5% +67 — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.38
28 2024 1973 157.6 +2.06 +3.44 1.105 52.2% -50 -13 -140 63.3% +0.79 9–9 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 105.7 +0.64 2022 1738 136.6 +0.54 +0.98 1.039 50.8% +82 -119 -95 53.7% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +0.65
29 2025 2004 161.4 +1.61 +2.90 1.085 52.0% -5 +75 -162 62.5% +0.68 11–5 (69%) 8–5 (62%) 106.8 +1.91 2023 1687 124.8 -0.97 +1.63 0.980 49.5% +59 +5 — 45.2% +0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -0.28
30 2026 1891 138.3 -0.19 +0.80 1.021 50.6% +24 +89 +18 50.7% +0.16 9–4 (69%) 1–5 (17%) 99.0 +2.54 2024 1668 125.0 -3.56 +1.68 0.966 49.2% +38 -36 +6 45.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.44
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1662 123.9 -0.99 -0.65 0.821 45.9% +19 — — 35.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.37
Career — 2056 144.8 -0.10 +1.43 1.005 50.3% -26 +27 -129 52.4% +0.10 65–40 (62%) 33–28 (54%) 112.0 +0.46 — 1859 140.0 -0.68 +1.60 0.990 49.8% +11 -29 -92 49.6% -0.03 59–51 (54%) 42–41 (51%) 102.9 -1.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.