H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Elena-Gabriela Ruse H2H: 0-1
Elena-Gabriela Ruse holds a 1–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena-Gabriela Ruse leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena-Gabriela Ruse won the 2022 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2022 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-3 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-1 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |