H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Elina Svitolina H2H: 0-2
Elina Svitolina holds a 2–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elina Svitolina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elina Svitolina won the 2025 Roland Garros fourth round 4-6 7-6(6) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2025 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Elina Svitolina | 4-6 7-6(6) 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 2-6 6-4 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Elina Svitolina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 |