H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jasmine Paolini vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 2-1

Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2026 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jasmine Paolini
Italy Age 30 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Magdalena Frech
Poland Age 28 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jasmine Paolini #8 6-2 6-3 Magdalena Frech #57 Match data Jan 21, 2026 R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Jasmine Paolini #35 6-1 6-3 Magdalena Frech #75 Match data Aug 23, 2023* R32 Tennis In the Land WTA 250 Hard
Magdalena Frech #100 6-2 6-3 Jasmine Paolini #68 Match data Apr 27, 2023* R128 Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jasmine Paolini #21 #4 5,865 2,056 176 138 56.1% 0 2 0 0 1 3
Magdalena Frech #41 #22 2,020 1,862 89 136 39.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jasmine Paolini Magdalena Frech
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2014 0–1 0.0% #520 1,490 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #490 1,471 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #172 1,434 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2018 3–10 23.1% #160 1,469 0 0
21 2017 0–2 0.0% #140 1,453 0 0 2019 0–6 0.0% #188 1,527 0 0
22 2018 3–5 37.5% #192 1,498 0 0 2020 2–2 50.0% #156 1,573 0 0
23 2019 6–9 40.0% #96 1,586 0 0 2021 4–8 33.3% #106 1,700 0 0
24 2020 4–8 33.3% #96 1,550 0 0 2022 11–19 36.7% #106 1,687 0 0
25 2021 20–19 51.3% #53 1,769 0 1 2023 12–18 40.0% #74 1,685 0 0
26 2022 22–20 52.4% #62 1,741 0 1 2024 28–26 51.9% #25 1,834 0 1
27 2023 25–23 52.1% #30 1,847 0 1 2025 15–25 37.5% #59 1,745 0 1
28 2024 40–19 67.8% #4 1,973 0 2 2026 14–19 42.4% #41 1,737 0 1
29 2025 40–20 66.7% #8 2,003 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2026 16–13 55.2% #21 1,891 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jasmine Paolini Magdalena Frech
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 6 6 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2019 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2022 5 10 15 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2021 17 13 30 56.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2023 5 12 17 29.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2024 20 15 35 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2023 19 15 34 55.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2025 10 16 26 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0%
28 2024 20 12 32 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2026 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2025 24 14 38 63.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 9 7 16 56.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 57 45 102 55.9% 15 12 27 55.6% — 54 80 134 40.3% 23 36 59 39.0% 12 20 32 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 211/225 of Magdalena Frech's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jasmine Paolini Magdalena Frech
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 1/1 0.0 2.0 62.9% 43.2% 42.3% 53.8% 66.7% 42.9% 41.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 3.0 4.0 64.9% 54.2% 38.5% 20.0% 0.0% 48.6% 23.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 0.0 2.0 61.4% 61.3% 51.3% 50.0% 25.0% 57.4% 39.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 13/13 2.4 3.1 53.9% 62.9% 42.5% 45.5% 33.5% 53.7% 38.1%
21 2017 2/2 0.0 3.0 57.7% 43.8% 38.8% 63.0% 0.0% 40.4% 28.4% 2019 6/6 1.5 3.0 61.9% 59.9% 41.4% 50.4% 41.3% 53.0% 38.4%
22 2018 8/8 0.4 1.6 66.1% 52.3% 45.2% 51.3% 50.3% 50.2% 43.5% 2020 4/4 0.8 4.0 61.2% 56.6% 38.0% 53.4% 56.2% 49.3% 44.8%
23 2019 15/15 0.7 3.2 66.2% 56.5% 45.9% 54.7% 50.4% 52.8% 41.7% 2021 12/12 1.8 2.6 61.7% 58.5% 47.6% 58.4% 38.5% 54.4% 40.2%
24 2020 12/12 0.7 2.9 63.6% 54.1% 41.6% 49.3% 44.2% 49.7% 47.1% 2022 30/30 2.7 2.3 62.0% 63.1% 43.7% 48.8% 44.9% 55.3% 42.6%
25 2021 38/39 0.9 2.5 66.3% 59.5% 45.8% 55.3% 49.1% 54.9% 43.2% 2023 30/30 2.8 2.0 63.4% 61.8% 48.5% 50.7% 49.3% 56.9% 43.1%
26 2022 40/42 0.8 2.3 66.5% 59.5% 46.8% 53.2% 49.7% 55.4% 43.9% 2024 53/54 2.4 1.9 64.3% 62.2% 46.7% 50.7% 41.5% 56.5% 42.4%
27 2023 47/48 0.9 1.8 68.3% 59.0% 48.4% 51.4% 45.2% 55.7% 43.5% 2025 29/40 2.4 2.1 58.1% 59.3% 45.9% 48.6% 43.1% 53.7% 41.6%
28 2024 53/59 1.3 1.8 67.8% 63.6% 47.8% 52.9% 52.6% 58.5% 45.8% 2026 31/33 2.7 2.1 59.9% 64.8% 46.4% 60.0% 48.8% 57.5% 45.3%
29 2025 51/61 1.3 1.5 68.1% 62.2% 49.5% 52.0% 49.2% 57.9% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 27/29 1.6 2.0 67.8% 60.6% 49.2% 58.9% 46.2% 56.5% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 293/315 1.1 2.0 67.2% 60.1% 47.4% 53.4% 48.5% 55.9% 44.3% — 211/225 2.4 2.2 61.4% 61.8% 45.8% 51.5% 43.8% 55.5% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jasmine Paolini Magdalena Frech
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1491 97.1 -0.69 -4.60 0.729 42.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1471 93.5 -3.01 -1.56 0.466 34.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1457 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1435 102.5 -2.29 -4.00 0.927 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.21
20 2016 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1469 104.4 -1.84 -3.84 0.821 46.3% -33 +65 — 24.1% -1.52 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.26
21 2017 1454 95.0 -0.81 -0.44 0.476 36.0% — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.39 2019 1527 111.4 -1.17 -2.94 0.817 45.7% -44 — — 20.0% -1.53 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.28
22 2018 1499 110.7 -1.60 -1.28 0.874 47.0% — +21 — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 2020 1573 114.7 -0.64 -0.12 0.885 47.2% — -36 — 50.0% -0.80 1–1 2–0 — +0.09
23 2019 1587 114.9 -2.75 -0.55 0.884 47.2% -71 +39 — 37.1% -1.12 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.63 2021 1700 121.1 -0.94 -1.52 0.881 47.4% -16 -132 — 40.7% -0.74 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.71
24 2020 1550 117.8 -2.87 +2.21 0.937 48.4% -99 +114 — 33.3% -0.85 2–1 (67%) — — -0.53 2022 1688 125.3 -0.47 +0.11 0.955 48.7% -2 -116 +26 36.5% -0.89 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 96.6 -2.48
25 2021 1770 130.2 -1.17 -0.08 0.958 49.4% -55 -35 — 47.8% -0.30 9–5 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 110.2 -0.03 2023 1685 127.9 +0.40 -0.13 1.001 49.8% -63 -18 +110 43.2% -0.19 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 -0.21
26 2022 1742 131.6 -1.55 +0.45 0.984 49.9% -12 +2 — 50.5% +0.13 11–10 (52%) 2–7 (22%) 98.4 -0.51 2024 1834 141.3 -0.08 -0.45 0.974 49.5% +19 -131 -51 47.7% -0.29 15–9 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 107.3 +0.90
27 2023 1848 138.9 -0.40 +0.93 0.981 49.6% -23 -12 -324 47.7% -0.21 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 106.5 -1.68 2025 1746 136.0 -1.85 -1.01 0.898 47.8% -1 -15 -107 40.0% -0.76 7–8 (47%) 6–3 (67%) 101.2 +1.07
28 2024 1973 157.6 +2.06 +3.44 1.105 52.2% -50 -13 -140 63.3% +0.79 9–9 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 105.7 +0.64 2026 1738 140.2 +0.10 +1.93 1.067 51.5% +44 -70 -154 46.2% -0.12 4–8 (33%) 6–5 (55%) 96.8 -0.33
29 2025 2004 161.4 +1.61 +2.90 1.085 52.0% -5 +75 -162 62.5% +0.68 11–5 (69%) 8–5 (62%) 106.8 +1.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 1891 138.3 -0.19 +0.80 1.021 50.6% +24 +89 +18 50.7% +0.16 9–4 (69%) 1–5 (17%) 99.0 +2.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2056 144.8 -0.10 +1.43 1.005 50.3% -26 +27 -129 52.4% +0.10 65–40 (62%) 33–28 (54%) 112.0 +0.46 — 1863 132.7 -0.51 -0.43 0.951 48.9% +1 -68 -10 41.3% -0.58 37–47 (44%) 27–27 (50%) 98.3 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.