H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 2-1
Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2026 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-2 6-3 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2023* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 6-3 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2023* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Magdalena Frech | 6-2 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |