H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:17 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Naomi Osaka H2H: 1-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Miami fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |