H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Nuria Parrizas Diaz H2H: 1-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Parrizas Diaz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2022 Palermo quarterfinal 6-7(5) 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 35
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2022* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 6-7(5) 7-5 6-2 | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Nuria Parrizas Diaz | #323 | #45 | 1,190 | 1,744 | 40 | 61 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #125 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #216 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |