H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Olga Danilovic H2H: 0-1
Olga Danilovic holds a 1–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olga Danilovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olga Danilovic won the 2023 Roland Garros second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 25
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Olga Danilovic | 6-2 7-5 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2021 | Miami | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Olga Danilovic | 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Olga Danilovic | #268 | #34 | 1,534 | 1,889 | 54 | 50 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Olga Danilovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #108 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #155 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #67 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #268 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |