H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Veronika Kudermetova H2H: 2-1
Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Veronika Kudermetova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Ningbo fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2025 | Ningbo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-2 7-5 | Veronika Kudermetova | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2025 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | Veronika Kudermetova | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2021* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Veronika Kudermetova | 6-3 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2017 | Prague | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | Veronika Kudermetova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Veronika Kudermetova | #125 | #9 | 2,950 | 1,976 | 205 | 152 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Veronika Kudermetova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #72 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |