H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Xiyu Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2022 Transylvania Open semifinal 7-5 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Xiyu Wang | Match data | Oct 15, 2022* | SF | Transylvania Open | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #21 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 176 | 138 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Xiyu Wang | #80 | #49 | 1,199 | 1,774 | 71 | 92 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Xiyu Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #639 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #209 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #144 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #50 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #98 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #175 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #80 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #21 | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Xiyu Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2026 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 104 | 81 | 185 | 56.2% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 53 | 69 | 122 | 43.4% | 16 | 16 | 32 | 50.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 155/163 of Xiyu Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Xiyu Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 64.3% | 61.3% | 42.5% | 41.7% | 27.8% | 54.5% | 42.9% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 4/4 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 64.2% | 50.9% | 47.7% | 28.6% | 42.1% | 49.8% | 40.5% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 61.9% | 58.3% | 47.8% | 41.7% | 27.6% | 54.3% | 36.9% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9/9 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 61.8% | 71.7% | 45.1% | 56.8% | 43.6% | 61.6% | 44.0% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9/9 | 5.3 | 7.7 | 61.0% | 69.1% | 46.8% | 54.2% | 43.3% | 60.1% | 35.7% |
| 21 | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 63.0% | 0.0% | 40.4% | 28.4% | 2022 | 23/23 | 3.7 | 5.2 | 64.7% | 65.3% | 41.4% | 55.3% | 43.1% | 56.9% | 41.2% |
| 22 | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 52.3% | 45.2% | 51.3% | 50.3% | 50.2% | 43.5% | 2023 | 40/40 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 64.6% | 68.4% | 44.1% | 54.9% | 38.4% | 59.9% | 40.4% |
| 23 | 2019 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 66.2% | 56.5% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 2024 | 41/44 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 63.6% | 67.6% | 48.0% | 59.1% | 42.3% | 60.2% | 41.7% |
| 24 | 2020 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 54.1% | 41.6% | 49.3% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 47.1% | 2025 | 8/12 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 67.1% | 59.2% | 46.5% | 47.6% | 51.7% | 54.8% | 41.6% |
| 25 | 2021 | 38/39 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 59.5% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 49.1% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 2026 | 10/11 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 72.0% | 59.2% | 45.6% | 62.7% | 62.8% | 56.8% | 46.7% |
| 26 | 2022 | 40/42 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.5% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 49.7% | 55.4% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/48 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 59.0% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 55.7% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 53/59 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 63.6% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 58.5% | 45.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 51/61 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.0% | 49.2% | 57.9% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 27/29 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 67.8% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.9% | 46.2% | 56.5% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 293/315 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 67.2% | 60.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 48.5% | 55.9% | 44.3% | — | 155/163 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 64.4% | 65.8% | 45.5% | 54.7% | 42.3% | 58.5% | 41.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Xiyu Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1493 | 102.6 | -0.03 | -1.38 | 0.942 | 48.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.00 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.04 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1539 | 113.0 | -1.31 | -1.37 | 0.806 | 45.1% | +12 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.56 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1549 | 116.5 | -1.02 | -2.91 | 0.808 | 45.8% | +8 | — | — | 26.3% | -1.63 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.04 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1642 | 128.8 | +2.08 | -0.04 | 1.144 | 52.7% | +21 | — | — | 61.9% | +1.14 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.4 | 0.00 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1590 | 113.7 | +1.46 | -3.26 | 0.895 | 48.3% | -1 | — | — | 34.8% | -1.13 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.6 | -0.61 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 | 2022 | 1702 | 127.2 | +0.16 | -0.43 | 0.957 | 49.1% | -3 | -89 | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–3 (70%) | 105.1 | -0.30 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2023 | 1698 | 126.2 | +1.61 | -1.99 | 1.006 | 50.0% | -39 | -37 | -107 | 44.8% | -0.23 | 7–11 (39%) | 6–13 (32%) | 91.1 | +0.18 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | 2024 | 1695 | 141.6 | +3.01 | -0.70 | 1.047 | 50.9% | -13 | +15 | — | 48.5% | +0.17 | 6–9 (40%) | 9–14 (39%) | 93.9 | -1.78 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 | 2025 | 1620 | 123.7 | -0.71 | -1.00 | 0.920 | 47.8% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -0.96 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | -0.15 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.2 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 | 2026 | 1770 | 138.1 | +1.51 | +2.93 | 1.082 | 52.0% | -45 | +23 | — | 47.6% | +0.38 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.32 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -13 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 2004 | 161.4 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -162 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1891 | 138.3 | -0.19 | +0.80 | 1.021 | 50.6% | +23 | +89 | +18 | 50.7% | +0.16 | 9–4 (69%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.0 | +2.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2056 | 144.8 | -0.10 | +1.43 | 1.005 | 50.3% | -26 | +27 | -129 | 52.4% | +0.10 | 65–40 (62%) | 33–28 (54%) | 112.0 | +0.46 | — | 1775 | 135.8 | +1.41 | -1.04 | 0.990 | 49.8% | -9 | -17 | -107 | 45.6% | -0.18 | 22–35 (39%) | 29–40 (42%) | 91.3 | -1.70 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 2026 | H2H |
| Leylah Fernandez | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 2 | 1 | 3 | Oct 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Linda Noskova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 27, 2025 | H2H |