H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jasmine Paolini vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 1-0

Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2021 US Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jasmine Paolini
Italy Age 30 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jasmine Paolini #99 6-3 6-4 Yaroslava Shvedova #452 Match data Sep 1, 2021* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jasmine Paolini #21 #4 5,865 2,056 176 138 56.1% 0 2 0 0 1 3
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,753 143 177 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jasmine Paolini Yaroslava Shvedova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,469 0 1
21 2017 0–2 0.0% #140 1,453 0 0 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1
22 2018 3–5 37.5% #192 1,498 0 0 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,666 0 1
23 2019 6–9 40.0% #96 1,586 0 0 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,577 0 1
24 2020 4–8 33.3% #96 1,550 0 0 2012 17–13 56.7% #29 1,690 0 1
25 2021 20–19 51.3% #53 1,769 0 1 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,651 0 1
26 2022 22–20 52.4% #62 1,741 0 1 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,647 0 1
27 2023 25–23 52.1% #30 1,847 0 1 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,617 0 1
28 2024 40–19 67.8% #4 1,973 0 2 2016 17–17 50.0% #37 1,708 0 1
29 2025 40–20 66.7% #8 2,003 0 3 2017 4–10 28.6% #289 1,616 0 1
30 2026 16–13 55.2% #21 1,891 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,604 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–10 9.1% #434 1,497 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jasmine Paolini Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 12 16 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2019 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2012 5 8 13 38.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 2021 17 13 30 56.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2023 19 15 34 55.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2024 20 12 32 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2016 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2025 24 14 38 63.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
30 2026 9 7 16 56.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 7 7 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 57 45 102 55.9% 15 12 27 55.6% — 71 109 180 39.4% 47 46 93 50.5% 25 22 47 53.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 277/318 of Yaroslava Shvedova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jasmine Paolini Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 2.3 2.7 45.6% 64.2% 50.7% 16.7% 47.2% 57.7% 46.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 17/24 2.6 3.4 57.6% 63.5% 44.3% 48.3% 51.3% 54.0% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 14/19 3.1 2.9 62.5% 60.4% 48.9% 50.9% 42.9% 56.2% 42.2%
21 2017 2/2 0.0 3.0 57.7% 43.8% 38.8% 63.0% 0.0% 40.4% 28.4% 2009 33/35 3.5 3.2 60.1% 67.7% 49.4% 54.7% 45.7% 60.4% 44.5%
22 2018 8/8 0.4 1.6 66.1% 52.3% 45.2% 51.3% 50.3% 50.2% 43.5% 2010 41/45 3.2 4.4 60.1% 62.0% 43.5% 48.1% 41.2% 54.6% 44.1%
23 2019 15/15 0.7 3.2 66.2% 56.5% 45.9% 54.7% 50.4% 52.8% 41.7% 2011 18/19 2.8 3.7 60.4% 60.6% 49.6% 53.0% 52.7% 55.7% 42.9%
24 2020 12/12 0.7 2.9 63.6% 54.1% 41.6% 49.3% 44.2% 49.7% 47.1% 2012 26/30 3.2 4.6 60.9% 67.0% 49.4% 56.5% 49.7% 59.9% 47.3%
25 2021 38/39 0.9 2.5 66.3% 59.5% 45.8% 55.3% 49.1% 54.9% 43.2% 2013 20/25 1.8 5.8 63.5% 60.8% 42.5% 36.3% 50.2% 53.9% 43.7%
26 2022 40/42 0.8 2.3 66.5% 59.5% 46.8% 53.2% 49.7% 55.4% 43.9% 2014 30/31 3.7 4.7 67.1% 63.6% 42.8% 54.7% 52.0% 56.6% 43.7%
27 2023 47/48 0.9 1.8 68.3% 59.0% 48.4% 51.4% 45.2% 55.7% 43.5% 2015 22/27 3.9 4.1 70.8% 63.1% 53.3% 52.9% 46.3% 60.4% 37.2%
28 2024 53/59 1.3 1.8 67.8% 63.6% 47.8% 52.9% 52.6% 58.5% 45.8% 2016 29/34 3.4 4.0 60.8% 66.9% 44.5% 58.1% 49.7% 57.9% 42.5%
29 2025 51/61 1.3 1.5 68.1% 62.2% 49.5% 52.0% 49.2% 57.9% 45.7% 2017 14/14 2.3 2.6 63.8% 60.8% 53.3% 43.1% 46.9% 58.1% 37.1%
30 2026 27/29 1.6 2.0 67.8% 60.6% 49.2% 58.9% 46.2% 56.5% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 69.4% 50.0% 40.0% 37.5% 16.7% 46.9% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 9/11 2.4 4.4 61.6% 56.6% 34.9% 42.8% 59.3% 48.3% 41.9%
Career — 293/315 1.1 2.0 67.2% 60.1% 47.4% 53.4% 48.5% 55.9% 44.3% — 277/320 3.1 4.0 62.2% 63.5% 46.5% 50.6% 47.9% 56.9% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jasmine Paolini Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1514 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1509 104.8 -1.22 -0.02 1.098 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — +0.02
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1492 109.2 -1.46 -3.15 0.852 46.6% +41 +11 +77 41.1% -0.72 5–5 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 96.9 +1.01
20 2016 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1469 115.8 -0.04 -1.88 0.963 48.9% -8 — +123 40.0% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +1.13
21 2017 1454 95.0 -0.81 -0.44 0.476 36.0% — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.39 2009 1601 137.0 +3.96 +0.37 1.124 52.2% -57 +30 -5 53.8% +0.55 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 +1.16
22 2018 1499 110.7 -1.60 -1.28 0.874 47.0% — +21 — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 2010 1667 129.4 -0.25 +0.48 0.973 49.2% -64 +71 -71 48.5% -0.03 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 104.8 +0.53
23 2019 1587 114.9 -2.75 -0.55 0.884 47.2% -71 +39 — 37.1% -1.12 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.63 2011 1578 115.3 -0.34 -1.96 0.967 49.3% +3 +72 -4 36.8% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 -0.35
24 2020 1550 117.8 -2.87 +2.21 0.937 48.4% -99 +114 — 33.3% -0.85 2–1 (67%) — — -0.53 2012 1690 136.2 +3.39 +2.47 1.179 53.1% -98 +77 -21 59.7% +0.82 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 99.0 -0.23
25 2021 1770 130.2 -1.17 -0.08 0.958 49.4% -55 -35 — 47.8% -0.30 9–5 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 110.2 -0.03 2013 1652 121.8 -0.93 -0.32 0.946 48.5% -128 +125 — 47.2% -0.15 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.25
26 2022 1742 131.6 -1.55 +0.45 0.984 49.9% -12 +2 — 50.5% +0.13 11–10 (52%) 2–7 (22%) 98.4 -0.51 2014 1648 124.3 +0.44 +0.21 1.008 50.2% -84 +42 +123 50.0% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 -0.21
27 2023 1848 138.9 -0.40 +0.93 0.981 49.6% -23 -12 -324 47.7% -0.21 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 106.5 -1.68 2015 1618 122.7 +0.99 -2.74 0.940 49.0% -34 +57 +131 51.6% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 6–6 (50%) 99.3 -0.26
28 2024 1973 157.6 +2.06 +3.44 1.105 52.2% -50 -13 -140 63.3% +0.79 9–9 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 105.7 +0.64 2016 1708 136.4 +1.33 -0.04 1.010 50.4% +6 -100 +67 51.4% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 -0.15
29 2025 2004 161.4 +1.61 +2.90 1.085 52.0% -5 +75 -162 62.5% +0.68 11–5 (69%) 8–5 (62%) 106.8 +1.91 2017 1616 115.6 +1.03 -2.59 0.886 47.4% +14 -16 — 37.5% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.1 -0.21
30 2026 1891 138.3 -0.19 +0.81 1.021 50.6% +23 +89 +18 50.7% +0.16 9–4 (69%) 1–5 (17%) 99.0 +2.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1605 100.0 -0.65 -0.84 0.671 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 103.5 -3.87 -0.08 0.810 45.2% -11 +77 — 13.6% -2.86 1–1 2–0 — +0.48
Career — 2056 144.8 -0.10 +1.43 1.005 50.3% -26 +27 -129 52.4% +0.10 65–40 (62%) 33–28 (54%) 112.0 +0.46 — 1754 131.8 +0.75 -0.43 0.991 49.7% -38 +48 +42 47.4% -0.12 43–60 (42%) 39–42 (48%) 96.3 +0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.