H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Louisa Chirico H2H: 2-0
Jelena Ostapenko holds a 2–0 lead over Louisa Chirico in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Ostapenko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2025 Charleston third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2025 | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Ostapenko | 7-5 6-2 | Louisa Chirico | Match data |
| May 30, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jelena Ostapenko | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Louisa Chirico | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Louisa Chirico | #382 | #58 | 1,020 | 1,668 | 19 | 45 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Louisa Chirico | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #111 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2016 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #208 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2023 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |