H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:18 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Qinwen Zheng H2H: 1-3
Qinwen Zheng holds a 3–1 lead over Jelena Ostapenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jelena Ostapenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2026 Rome third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Ostapenko | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2023 | Zhuhai | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2023* | Abu Dhabi | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 7-6(10) 6-1 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |