H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Jennifer Brady vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 1-1
Jennifer Brady and Alizé Cornet are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Brady won the 2018 Guangzhou third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 36
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 6-0 6-3 | Alizé Cornet | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2016 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Alizé Cornet | 7-5 7-6(4) | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2016* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alizé Cornet | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alizé Cornet | #460 | #11 | 3,256 | 1,884 | 376 | 358 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Brady | Alizé Cornet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #16 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #88 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #44 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #19 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #43 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,702 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #38 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #59 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #61 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #117 | 1,684 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #391 | 1,613 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,558 | 0 | 6 |