H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Jennifer Brady vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 1-2
Ashleigh Barty holds a 2–1 lead over Jennifer Brady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jennifer Brady won the 2020 Brisbane fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2020* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 6-4 7-6(4) | Ashleigh Barty | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2019* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Ashleigh Barty | 6-3 6-1 | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 6-3 6-2 | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Brady | Ashleigh Barty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 |
| 26 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |