H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Bernarda Pera H2H: 3-0
Jessica Pegula holds a 3–0 lead over Bernarda Pera in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2025 Miami second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-4 6-4 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2024* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-4 6-4 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |