H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Jasmine Paolini H2H: 4-0
Jessica Pegula holds a 4–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2025 WTA Finals semifinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2025 | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | SF | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-2 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2023* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-4 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2022* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jessica Pegula | 6-2 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-4 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Jasmine Paolini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |