H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Leylah Fernandez H2H: 3-1
Jessica Pegula holds a 3–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2026 Miami third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2026 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-2 6-2 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2025 | Washington DC | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2024* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 7-5 6-7(1) 7-6(3) | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2024* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 7-5 6-4 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |