H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Paula Badosa H2H: 3-1
Jessica Pegula holds a 3–1 lead over Paula Badosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2024 Beijing fourth round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2024* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-4 6-0 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2024* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2023* | Charleston | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Jessica Pegula | 6-3 7-6(6) | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| Apr 1, 2022* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 4-1 (ret.) | Paula Badosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 171 | 112 | 60.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Paula Badosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,876 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |