H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jessica Pegula vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 5-3

Jessica Pegula holds a 5–3 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2025 US Open third round 6-1 7-5.

USA Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2025 US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jessica Pegula #4 6-1 7-5 Victoria Azarenka #132 Match data
Apr 6, 2024* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Jessica Pegula #5 6-4 3-6 7-6(7) Victoria Azarenka #26 Match data
Jan 26, 2023* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #24 6-4 6-1 Jessica Pegula #3 Match data
Oct 22, 2022* Guadalajara 2 WTA 1000 SF Hard Jessica Pegula #5 7-6(3) 6-1 Victoria Azarenka #37 Match data
Oct 15, 2021* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #32 6-4 6-2 Jessica Pegula #24 Match data
Jun 19, 2021* Berlin WTA 500 QF Grass Victoria Azarenka #16 6-2 5-7 6-4 Jessica Pegula #26 Match data
May 3, 2021* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Jessica Pegula #33 (w/o) Victoria Azarenka #15 Match data
Feb 10, 2021* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jessica Pegula #61 7-5 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jessica Pegula #3 #3 6,768 2,156 285 134 68.0% 0 4 0 5 2 11
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jessica Pegula Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #150 1,478 0 0 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 2013 2–4 33.3% #203 1,489 0 0 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5
21 2015 2–4 33.3% #155 1,484 0 0 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8
22 2016 2–3 40.0% #167 1,457 0 0 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #627 1,442 0 0 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17
24 2018 4–1 80.0% #111 1,572 0 0 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17
25 2019 9–13 40.9% #83 1,624 0 1 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17
26 2020 10–6 62.5% #63 1,782 0 1 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2021 38–18 67.9% #18 1,944 0 1 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2022 42–20 67.7% #3 1,977 0 2 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2023 54–17 76.1% #5 2,084 0 4 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2024 35–15 70.0% #7 2,029 0 6 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2025 52–21 71.2% #6 2,057 0 9 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2026 35–9 79.5% #3 2,113 0 11 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21