H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Yi Miao Zhou H2H: 0-1
Yi Miao Zhou holds a 1–0 lead over Jessica Pegula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yi Miao Zhou leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yi Miao Zhou won the 2013 Shenzhen third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2013* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yi Miao Zhou | 6-4 6-2 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Yi Miao Zhou | #573 | #127 | 521 | 1,502 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jessica Pegula | Yi Miao Zhou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #304 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |