H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jil Teichmann vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 1-1

Jil Teichmann and Alison Riske-Amritraj are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2022 Miami Open first round 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jil Teichmann
Switzerland Age 29 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Riske-Amritraj #50 7-6(5) 6-3 Jil Teichmann #37 Match data Mar 24, 2022* R128 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard
Jil Teichmann #42 6-3 1-6 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #32 Match data Sep 24, 2021* R16 Ostrava WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jil Teichmann #175 #21 2,101 1,882 94 104 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jil Teichmann Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2016 1–1 50.0% #209 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 1–3 25.0% #139 1,523 0 0 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2018 3–6 33.3% #148 1,532 0 0 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0
21 2019 12–10 54.5% #69 1,609 0 2 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0
22 2020 9–12 42.9% #57 1,671 0 2 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0
23 2021 23–20 53.5% #37 1,777 0 2 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1
24 2022 19–21 47.5% #35 1,694 0 2 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2023 9–18 33.3% #147 1,625 0 2 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1
26 2024 3–2 60.0% #135 1,617 0 2 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1
27 2025 8–9 47.1% #123 1,648 0 2 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1
28 2026 6–2 75.0% #175 1,708 0 2 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jil Teichmann Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2019 0 7 7 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0%
23 2021 20 13 33 60.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2022 8 14 22 36.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2024 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2025 3 3 6 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2026 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 50 61 111 45.0% 43 34 77 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's and 369/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jil Teichmann Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2016 2/2 3.5 6.5 44.3% 70.9% 50.5% 63.5% 54.2% 59.3% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 4/4 2.0 5.0 53.5% 55.0% 40.6% 31.7% 45.4% 47.4% 34.9% 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7%
20 2018 9/9 3.1 2.9 62.4% 69.7% 44.8% 55.3% 38.8% 60.4% 39.6% 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5%
21 2019 22/22 1.9 1.6 63.6% 64.4% 50.3% 57.3% 52.8% 59.2% 45.0% 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7%
22 2020 20/21 2.7 2.9 62.6% 64.0% 49.0% 60.6% 49.2% 58.2% 45.6% 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2%
23 2021 40/43 2.2 3.5 59.1% 63.8% 48.7% 56.1% 45.2% 57.5% 43.2% 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5%
24 2022 40/40 2.3 3.7 60.3% 63.7% 45.7% 52.8% 49.0% 56.3% 42.6% 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3%
25 2023 27/27 2.4 3.5 59.7% 61.7% 43.4% 48.4% 44.7% 54.6% 41.2% 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0%
26 2024 4/5 0.5 2.8 64.1% 60.7% 40.1% 31.7% 51.0% 52.6% 50.8% 2017 42/43 1.2 3.3 68.0% 62.0% 43.7% 51.2% 44.2% 56.0% 42.4%
27 2025 8/17 1.3 3.0 63.6% 58.2% 35.0% 35.0% 29.0% 50.2% 35.5% 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3%
28 2026 8/8 0.6 3.4 67.7% 58.6% 50.2% 52.7% 47.9% 56.0% 45.9% 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2%
Career — 184/198 2.2 3.2 60.9% 63.2% 46.4% 52.8% 46.6% 56.5% 42.9% — 369/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.7% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.4% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jil Teichmann Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2016 1524 100.0 +0.12 +0.08 1.022 50.4% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1523 105.8 -2.24 -1.97 0.664 41.0% — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 — — -0.23 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 -0.48
20 2018 1533 114.7 +2.45 -2.19 1.002 49.7% +16 — — 40.0% -0.15 0–2 0–4 (0%) — -0.57 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54
21 2019 1610 121.1 +1.59 +1.12 1.104 52.0% -95 +168 — 53.1% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.11 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29
22 2020 1672 133.5 +0.65 +1.84 1.092 51.6% -40 +83 — 51.1% +0.29 0–5 (0%) 1–1 — -0.20 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38
23 2021 1777 147.8 +1.29 +1.02 1.017 50.5% +25 -71 — 54.4% +0.13 7–7 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.0 -0.26 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +0.46
24 2022 1694 140.7 -0.18 +0.52 0.976 49.5% -3 +179 -208 49.4% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 6–10 (38%) 95.6 -0.06 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 -1.44
25 2023 1626 126.4 -0.88 -1.70 0.908 48.0% +59 +76 -120 40.9% -0.68 3–9 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 90.9 +0.06 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) 94.1 -0.28
26 2024 1617 107.3 -1.72 +1.68 1.072 51.5% -24 — — 55.6% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2017 1642 129.3 +0.27 -0.29 0.966 49.2% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -2.21
27 2025 1648 117.6 -2.75 -3.33 0.712 42.6% +30 +36 — 44.7% -0.79 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -0.29 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.8 -0.45
28 2026 1708 124.4 +0.10 +2.08 1.042 51.0% — +59 — 70.6% +0.94 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.5 -1.98
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 0.00
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.58
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 101.9 +0.60
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21
Career — 1883 134.4 +0.29 +0.25 0.986 49.7% +5 +91 -158 49.2% -0.12 24–35 (41%) 23–29 (44%) 92.9 -0.64 — 1860 137.7 +0.67 +0.22 1.002 50.0% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.