H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Jil Teichmann vs Hanne Vandewinkel

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jil Teichmann vs Hanne Vandewinkel.

Switzerland Age 29 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Belgium Age 22 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jil Teichmann #196 6-4 6-3 Hanne Vandewinkel #98 Match data May 4, 2026 Q1 Q Italian Open WTA 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jil Teichmann #168 #21 2,101 1,882 96 104 48.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Hanne Vandewinkel #103 #77 919 1,659 2 7 22.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jil Teichmann Hanne Vandewinkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2016 1–1 50.0% #209 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 1–3 25.0% #139 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2018 3–6 33.3% #148 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2019 12–10 54.5% #69 1,610 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2020 9–12 42.9% #57 1,671 0 2 2026 2–7 22.2% #103 1,639 0 0
23 2021 23–20 53.5% #37 1,777 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2022 19–21 47.5% #35 1,694 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2023 9–18 33.3% #147 1,625 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2024 3–2 60.0% #135 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2025 8–9 47.1% #123 1,648 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2026 8–2 80.0% #168 1,718 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jil Teichmann Hanne Vandewinkel
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 0 7 7 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2021 20 13 33 60.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 8 14 22 36.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2024 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 3 3 6 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 2 0 2 100.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 61 113 46.0% 43 34 77 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 185/200 of Jil Teichmann's and 9/9 of Hanne Vandewinkel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jil Teichmann Hanne Vandewinkel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2016 2/2 3.5 6.5 44.3% 70.9% 50.5% 63.5% 54.2% 59.3% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 4/4 2.0 5.0 53.5% 55.0% 40.6% 31.7% 45.4% 47.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 9/9 3.1 2.9 62.4% 69.7% 44.8% 55.3% 38.8% 60.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 22/22 1.9 1.6 63.6% 64.4% 50.3% 57.3% 52.8% 59.2% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 20/21 2.7 2.9 62.6% 64.0% 49.0% 60.6% 49.2% 58.2% 45.6% 2026 9/9 3.1 4.8 65.2% 61.2% 37.6% 56.9% 40.9% 52.9% 37.5%
23 2021 40/43 2.2 3.5 59.1% 63.8% 48.7% 56.1% 45.2% 57.5% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 40/40 2.3 3.7 60.3% 63.7% 45.7% 52.8% 49.0% 56.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2023 27/27 2.4 3.5 59.7% 61.7% 43.4% 48.4% 44.7% 54.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2024 4/5 0.5 2.8 64.1% 60.7% 40.1% 31.7% 51.0% 52.6% 50.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 8/17 1.3 3.0 63.6% 58.2% 35.0% 35.0% 29.0% 50.2% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 9/10 0.8 3.4 68.0% 59.2% 49.7% 56.2% 51.8% 56.2% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 185/200 2.2 3.2 61.0% 63.2% 46.4% 52.9% 46.9% 56.6% 42.9% — 9/9 3.1 4.8 65.2% 61.2% 37.6% 56.9% 40.9% 52.9% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jil Teichmann Hanne Vandewinkel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2016 1524 100.0 +0.12 +0.08 1.022 50.4% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1523 105.8 -2.24 -1.97 0.664 41.0% — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1533 114.7 +2.45 -2.19 1.002 49.7% +16 — — 40.0% -0.15 0–2 0–4 (0%) — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 1610 121.1 +1.59 +1.12 1.104 52.0% -96 +168 — 53.1% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.11 2025 1611 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 1672 133.5 +0.65 +1.84 1.092 51.6% -40 +84 — 51.1% +0.29 0–5 (0%) 1–1 — -0.19 2026 1639 110.0 -2.31 -1.24 0.796 45.7% — -97 -28 28.6% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.46
23 2021 1777 147.8 +1.29 +1.02 1.017 50.5% +25 -71 — 54.4% +0.13 7–7 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.0 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 1694 140.7 -0.18 +0.52 0.976 49.5% -3 +179 -208 49.4% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 6–10 (38%) 95.6 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2023 1626 126.4 -0.88 -1.70 0.908 48.0% +59 +74 -120 40.9% -0.68 3–9 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 90.9 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2024 1617 107.3 -1.72 +1.68 1.072 51.5% -24 — — 55.6% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 1648 117.5 -2.75 -3.33 0.712 42.6% +31 +36 — 44.7% -0.79 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 1737 126.7 -0.10 +1.85 1.064 51.5% — +27 — 72.7% +1.27 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 134.5 +0.28 +0.25 0.988 49.7% +5 +87 -158 49.5% -0.09 25–35 (42%) 23–29 (44%) 93.6 -0.64 — 1659 106.7 -2.31 -1.24 0.796 45.7% — -97 -28 28.6% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -5.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.