H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Julia Grabher H2H: 1-2
Julia Grabher holds a 2–1 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Grabher leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2026 Rabat third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 30
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2026 | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 6-4 7-6(5) | Julia Grabher | Match data |
| May 12, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Julia Grabher | 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2022* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julia Grabher | 6-4 6-4 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Julia Grabher | #116 | #54 | 1,004 | 1,680 | 19 | 37 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Julia Grabher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #82 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #101 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #95 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |