H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jil Teichmann vs Lauren Davis H2H: 0-2

Lauren Davis holds a 2–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lauren Davis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2023 Dubai Tennis Championships first round 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jil Teichmann
Switzerland Age 29 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lauren Davis #49 6-4 4-6 6-3 Jil Teichmann #32 Match data Feb 21, 2023* R64 Dubai Tennis Championships WTA 1000 Hard
Lauren Davis #95 1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Jil Teichmann #37 Match data Jan 12, 2022* R32 Adelaide 2 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jil Teichmann #175 #21 2,101 1,882 94 104 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jil Teichmann Lauren Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0
18 2016 1–1 50.0% #209 1,524 0 0 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0
19 2017 1–3 25.0% #139 1,523 0 0 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0
20 2018 3–6 33.3% #148 1,532 0 0 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0
21 2019 12–10 54.5% #69 1,609 0 2 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0
22 2020 9–12 42.9% #57 1,671 0 2 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0
23 2021 23–20 53.5% #37 1,777 0 2 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1
24 2022 19–21 47.5% #35 1,694 0 2 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1
25 2023 9–18 33.3% #147 1,625 0 2 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1
26 2024 3–2 60.0% #135 1,617 0 2 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1
27 2025 8–9 47.1% #123 1,648 0 2 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1
28 2026 6–2 75.0% #175 1,708 0 2 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jil Teichmann Lauren Davis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2019 0 7 7 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2021 20 13 33 60.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2022 8 14 22 36.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2024 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2025 3 3 6 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2026 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 50 61 111 45.0% 43 34 77 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jil Teichmann Lauren Davis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6%
18 2016 2/2 3.5 6.5 44.3% 70.9% 50.5% 63.5% 54.2% 59.3% 41.6% 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9%
19 2017 4/4 2.0 5.0 53.5% 55.0% 40.6% 31.7% 45.4% 47.4% 34.9% 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9%
20 2018 9/9 3.1 2.9 62.4% 69.7% 44.8% 55.3% 38.8% 60.4% 39.6% 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8%
21 2019 22/22 1.9 1.6 63.6% 64.4% 50.3% 57.3% 52.8% 59.2% 45.0% 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7%
22 2020 20/21 2.7 2.9 62.6% 64.0% 49.0% 60.6% 49.2% 58.2% 45.6% 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2021 40/43 2.2 3.5 59.1% 63.8% 48.7% 56.1% 45.2% 57.5% 43.2% 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6%
24 2022 40/40 2.3 3.7 60.3% 63.7% 45.7% 52.8% 49.0% 56.3% 42.6% 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6%
25 2023 27/27 2.4 3.5 59.7% 61.7% 43.4% 48.4% 44.7% 54.6% 41.2% 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3%
26 2024 4/5 0.5 2.8 64.1% 60.7% 40.1% 31.7% 51.0% 52.6% 50.8% 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2%
27 2025 8/17 1.3 3.0 63.6% 58.2% 35.0% 35.0% 29.0% 50.2% 35.5% 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0%
28 2026 8/8 0.6 3.4 67.7% 58.6% 50.2% 52.7% 47.9% 56.0% 45.9% 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8%
Career — 184/198 2.2 3.2 60.9% 63.2% 46.4% 52.8% 46.6% 56.5% 42.9% — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jil Teichmann Lauren Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
18 2016 1524 100.0 +0.12 +0.08 1.022 50.4% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
19 2017 1523 105.8 -2.24 -1.97 0.664 41.0% — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 — — -0.23 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03
20 2018 1533 114.7 +2.45 -2.19 1.002 49.7% +16 — — 40.0% -0.15 0–2 0–4 (0%) — -0.57 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07
21 2019 1610 121.1 +1.59 +1.12 1.104 52.0% -95 +168 — 53.1% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.11 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82
22 2020 1672 133.5 +0.65 +1.84 1.092 51.6% -40 +83 — 51.1% +0.29 0–5 (0%) 1–1 — -0.20 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31
23 2021 1777 147.8 +1.29 +1.02 1.017 50.5% +25 -71 — 54.4% +0.13 7–7 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.0 -0.26 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39
24 2022 1694 140.7 -0.18 +0.52 0.976 49.5% -3 +179 -208 49.4% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 6–10 (38%) 95.6 -0.06 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 2023 1626 126.4 -0.88 -1.70 0.908 48.0% +59 +76 -120 40.9% -0.68 3–9 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 90.9 +0.06 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90
26 2024 1617 107.3 -1.72 +1.68 1.072 51.5% -24 — — 55.6% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17
27 2025 1648 117.6 -2.75 -3.33 0.712 42.6% +30 +36 — 44.7% -0.79 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -0.29 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59
28 2026 1708 124.4 +0.10 +2.08 1.042 51.0% — +59 — 70.6% +0.94 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00
Career — 1883 134.4 +0.29 +0.25 0.986 49.7% +5 +91 -158 49.2% -0.12 24–35 (41%) 23–29 (44%) 92.9 -0.64 — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.