H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jil Teichmann vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 0-1

Lesia Tsurenko holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2023 Madrid Open second round 3-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jil Teichmann
Switzerland Age 29 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesia Tsurenko #77 3-6 6-2 6-4 Jil Teichmann #30 Match data Apr 28, 2023* R64 Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jil Teichmann #175 #21 2,101 1,882 94 104 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jil Teichmann Lesia Tsurenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2016 1–1 50.0% #209 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 1–3 25.0% #139 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2018 3–6 33.3% #148 1,532 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0
21 2019 12–10 54.5% #69 1,609 0 2 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0
22 2020 9–12 42.9% #57 1,671 0 2 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0
23 2021 23–20 53.5% #37 1,777 0 2 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0
24 2022 19–21 47.5% #35 1,694 0 2 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0
25 2023 9–18 33.3% #147 1,625 0 2 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0
26 2024 3–2 60.0% #135 1,617 0 2 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1
27 2025 8–9 47.1% #123 1,648 0 2 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2
28 2026 6–2 75.0% #175 1,708 0 2 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jil Teichmann Lesia Tsurenko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2019 0 7 7 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2021 20 13 33 60.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2022 8 14 22 36.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2024 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2025 3 3 6 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2026 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 50 61 111 45.0% 43 34 77 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's and 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jil Teichmann Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2016 2/2 3.5 6.5 44.3% 70.9% 50.5% 63.5% 54.2% 59.3% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 4/4 2.0 5.0 53.5% 55.0% 40.6% 31.7% 45.4% 47.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 9/9 3.1 2.9 62.4% 69.7% 44.8% 55.3% 38.8% 60.4% 39.6% 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6%
21 2019 22/22 1.9 1.6 63.6% 64.4% 50.3% 57.3% 52.8% 59.2% 45.0% 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6%
22 2020 20/21 2.7 2.9 62.6% 64.0% 49.0% 60.6% 49.2% 58.2% 45.6% 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4%
23 2021 40/43 2.2 3.5 59.1% 63.8% 48.7% 56.1% 45.2% 57.5% 43.2% 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7%
24 2022 40/40 2.3 3.7 60.3% 63.7% 45.7% 52.8% 49.0% 56.3% 42.6% 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8%
25 2023 27/27 2.4 3.5 59.7% 61.7% 43.4% 48.4% 44.7% 54.6% 41.2% 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5%
26 2024 4/5 0.5 2.8 64.1% 60.7% 40.1% 31.7% 51.0% 52.6% 50.8% 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8%
27 2025 8/17 1.3 3.0 63.6% 58.2% 35.0% 35.0% 29.0% 50.2% 35.5% 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5%
28 2026 8/8 0.6 3.4 67.7% 58.6% 50.2% 52.7% 47.9% 56.0% 45.9% 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7%
Career — 184/198 2.2 3.2 60.9% 63.2% 46.4% 52.8% 46.6% 56.5% 42.9% — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jil Teichmann Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2016 1524 100.0 +0.12 +0.08 1.022 50.4% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1523 105.8 -2.24 -1.97 0.664 41.0% — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1533 114.7 +2.45 -2.19 1.002 49.7% +16 — — 40.0% -0.15 0–2 0–4 (0%) — -0.57 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15
21 2019 1610 121.1 +1.59 +1.12 1.104 52.0% -95 +168 — 53.1% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.11 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08
22 2020 1672 133.5 +0.65 +1.84 1.092 51.6% -40 +83 — 51.1% +0.29 0–5 (0%) 1–1 — -0.20 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34
23 2021 1777 147.8 +1.29 +1.02 1.017 50.5% +25 -71 — 54.4% +0.13 7–7 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.0 -0.26 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05
24 2022 1694 140.7 -0.18 +0.52 0.976 49.5% -3 +179 -208 49.4% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 6–10 (38%) 95.6 -0.06 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31
25 2023 1626 126.4 -0.88 -1.70 0.908 48.0% +59 +76 -120 40.9% -0.68 3–9 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 90.9 +0.06 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32
26 2024 1617 107.3 -1.72 +1.68 1.072 51.5% -24 — — 55.6% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25
27 2025 1648 117.6 -2.75 -3.33 0.712 42.6% +30 +36 — 44.7% -0.79 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -0.29 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38
28 2026 1708 124.4 +0.10 +2.08 1.042 51.0% — +59 — 70.6% +0.94 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10
Career — 1883 134.4 +0.29 +0.25 0.986 49.7% +5 +91 -158 49.2% -0.12 24–35 (41%) 23–29 (44%) 92.9 -0.64 — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.