H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Mihaela Buzarnescu H2H: 1-0
Jil Teichmann holds a 1–0 lead over Mihaela Buzarnescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2021 Phillip Island Trophy second round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2021* | Phillip Island Trophy | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Jil Teichmann | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | Mihaela Buzarnescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,872 | 58 | 63 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #24 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #404 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |