H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Jil Teichmann vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-0

Jil Teichmann holds a 1–0 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2022 Toronto second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jil Teichmann
SUI Age 29 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 2022* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Jil Teichmann #21 6-2 6-3 Venus Williams #1556 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jil Teichmann #119 #21 2,101 1,876 98 107 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jil Teichmann Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2016 1–1 50.0% #209 1,524 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2017 1–3 25.0% #139 1,523 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2018 3–6 33.3% #148 1,531 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2019 14–11 56.0% #69 1,632 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2020 9–12 42.9% #57 1,671 0 2 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2021 23–20 53.5% #37 1,766 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2022 19–21 47.5% #35 1,690 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2023 11–20 35.5% #147 1,613 0 2 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2024 3–2 60.0% #135 1,633 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2025 8–9 47.1% #123 1,651 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2026 6–2 75.0% #119 1,709 0 2 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47