H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Johanna Konta vs Asia Muhammad H2H: 0-1
Asia Muhammad holds a 1–0 lead over Johanna Konta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Asia Muhammad leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Asia Muhammad won the 2014 Quebec City third round 6-2 6-7(0) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2014* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Asia Muhammad | 6-2 6-7(0) 7-6(4) | Johanna Konta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Asia Muhammad | #839 | #124 | 461 | 1,555 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Asia Muhammad | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #613 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #217 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #365 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |