H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Johanna Konta vs Denisa Satralova H2H: 2-1
Johanna Konta holds a 2–1 lead over Denisa Satralova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Johanna Konta leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Denisa Satralova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Johanna Konta won the 2016 Indian Wells third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Johanna Konta | 6-4 6-1 | Denisa Satralova | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Johanna Konta | 6-2 6-2 | Denisa Satralova | Match data |
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Denisa Satralova | 7-6(17) 4-6 6-2 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Denisa Satralova | #823 | #55 | 1,029 | 1,726 | 43 | 47 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Denisa Satralova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #108 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #62 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #130 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |