H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Johanna Konta vs Olga Govortsova H2H: 0-1
Olga Govortsova holds a 1–0 lead over Johanna Konta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olga Govortsova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olga Govortsova won the 2012 US Open second round 2-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Olga Govortsova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |