Johanna Konta
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 6 | 1 | 7 | Aug 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 4, 2019 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 28, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Johanna Konta holds a 1–0 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johanna Konta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johanna Konta won the 2016 US Open second round 6-2 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data | Sep 1, 2016* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 2,019 | 179 | 122 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,774 | 172 | 226 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Tsvetana Pironkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #37 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,929 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Tsvetana Pironkova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2013 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2015 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2016 | 38 | 15 | 53 | 71.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2017 | 21 | 9 | 30 | 70.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 109 | 72 | 181 | 60.2% | 24 | 24 | 48 | 50.0% | 46 | 26 | 72 | 63.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 88 | 128 | 216 | 40.7% | 49 | 65 | 114 | 43.0% | 33 | 27 | 60 | 55.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 276/302 of Johanna Konta's and 329/389 of Tsvetana Pironkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Tsvetana Pironkova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15/31 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 61.1% | 60.2% | 48.4% | 46.9% | 54.3% | 55.8% | 43.4% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 16/22 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 55.4% | 63.2% | 46.9% | 49.4% | 39.0% | 56.0% | 38.1% |
| 20 | 2011 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 64.9% | 57.1% | 52.9% | 45.5% | 41.7% | 55.7% | 43.8% | 2008 | 30/34 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 60.1% | 61.2% | 44.7% | 47.9% | 49.0% | 54.6% | 46.4% |
| 21 | 2012 | 5/5 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 64.7% | 63.2% | 47.4% | 55.5% | 45.6% | 57.5% | 44.3% | 2009 | 29/29 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 59.9% | 59.9% | 39.9% | 46.7% | 44.8% | 51.7% | 45.5% |
| 22 | 2013 | 8/8 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 55.7% | 68.5% | 46.1% | 48.8% | 38.5% | 58.3% | 41.4% | 2010 | 27/31 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 54.7% | 65.0% | 47.7% | 51.2% | 45.0% | 57.3% | 43.6% |
| 23 | 2014 | 10/10 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 60.9% | 65.0% | 42.9% | 49.1% | 40.9% | 56.8% | 38.9% | 2011 | 34/35 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 55.8% | 64.2% | 44.9% | 51.3% | 52.0% | 55.8% | 43.1% |
| 24 | 2015 | 13/21 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 68.7% | 68.4% | 54.6% | 56.3% | 39.5% | 64.3% | 42.4% | 2012 | 35/44 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 54.1% | 63.0% | 46.1% | 47.9% | 45.3% | 55.3% | 43.0% |
| 25 | 2016 | 58/70 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 61.5% | 69.0% | 53.3% | 59.0% | 49.3% | 63.0% | 45.6% | 2013 | 23/30 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 56.7% | 63.3% | 43.2% | 55.8% | 52.5% | 54.8% | 39.6% |
| 26 | 2017 | 51/53 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 62.3% | 70.1% | 51.3% | 57.9% | 46.4% | 63.0% | 44.3% | 2014 | 31/36 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 59.2% | 63.8% | 41.8% | 46.1% | 49.7% | 55.1% | 44.9% |
| 27 | 2018 | 47/50 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 61.3% | 69.1% | 49.2% | 61.8% | 47.7% | 61.3% | 43.1% | 2015 | 35/39 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 58.5% | 61.9% | 48.0% | 49.0% | 53.4% | 56.1% | 43.2% |
| 28 | 2019 | 48/48 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 66.7% | 68.3% | 51.8% | 65.4% | 47.3% | 62.7% | 43.1% | 2016 | 22/25 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 59.6% | 62.1% | 47.0% | 43.8% | 48.9% | 56.0% | 45.0% |
| 29 | 2020 | 17/17 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 62.8% | 72.3% | 52.5% | 61.1% | 29.6% | 64.7% | 39.9% | 2017 | 16/16 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 61.3% | 60.2% | 44.4% | 54.9% | 55.7% | 54.5% | 42.8% |
| 30 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 64.4% | 67.0% | 48.1% | 55.1% | 46.8% | 60.2% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7/8 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 56.4% | 72.4% | 51.5% | 63.1% | 55.5% | 63.4% | 45.6% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 56.1% | 58.9% | 41.4% | 54.4% | 52.1% | 50.9% | 39.2% |
| Career | — | 276/302 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 63.0% | 68.8% | 51.0% | 59.4% | 45.6% | 62.2% | 43.2% | — | 329/398 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 57.7% | 62.6% | 45.1% | 49.5% | 49.3% | 55.3% | 43.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Tsvetana Pironkova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1599 | 115.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +76 | — | 55.6% | -0.39 | 2–0 | 2–0 | — | -1.06 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1662 | 128.0 | +0.23 | -0.30 | 0.983 | 49.4% | -89 | +15 | -33 | 48.6% | -0.16 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.0 | -1.93 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1595 | 110.6 | +0.26 | -3.72 | 0.866 | 47.2% | -8 | -16 | +24 | 34.0% | -1.34 | 3–3 (50%) | 7–3 (70%) | 103.3 | -0.77 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1495 | 105.2 | -3.70 | +5.19 | 0.987 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.21 | 2008 | 1636 | 132.0 | +0.57 | +1.97 | 1.023 | 50.3% | -49 | +36 | — | 48.7% | +0.09 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–6 (45%) | 96.9 | -1.40 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1507 | 102.4 | -0.74 | -0.74 | 1.042 | 50.4% | +26 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.06 | 2009 | 1549 | 125.5 | -2.40 | +1.22 | 0.943 | 48.7% | +82 | -36 | — | 36.8% | -0.81 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.6 | -0.39 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1505 | 104.2 | +1.55 | -1.52 | 0.991 | 49.6% | +49 | — | +8 | 41.2% | -0.41 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.37 | 2010 | 1626 | 127.4 | +1.40 | +0.29 | 1.021 | 50.4% | -41 | -62 | +77 | 52.2% | -0.10 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–1 (80%) | 100.3 | +1.48 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1461 | 102.5 | +0.14 | -3.37 | 0.901 | 48.0% | +28 | — | +83 | 30.4% | -0.91 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.42 | 2011 | 1646 | 133.0 | +0.53 | +0.21 | 0.976 | 49.6% | -79 | -82 | +146 | 41.0% | -0.56 | 2–8 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.3 | -0.71 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1696 | 133.9 | +4.57 | +1.53 | 1.188 | 53.1% | -49 | — | -54 | 59.2% | +0.59 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.5 | -1.09 | 2012 | 1664 | 127.1 | -0.33 | -0.08 | 0.964 | 49.3% | -52 | -52 | +136 | 44.3% | -0.48 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.6 | +0.41 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1910 | 150.9 | +5.83 | +2.56 | 1.233 | 53.8% | +17 | -422 | -216 | 66.0% | +1.14 | 10–9 (53%) | 12–2 (86%) | 108.0 | +1.13 | 2013 | 1562 | 112.6 | -0.51 | -2.67 | 0.876 | 47.5% | -70 | -49 | +254 | 36.2% | -0.75 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.0 | -0.24 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1857 | 150.3 | +6.00 | +1.48 | 1.198 | 53.3% | +43 | -355 | +71 | 65.8% | +1.10 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.2 | -0.38 | 2014 | 1599 | 135.7 | -0.20 | +1.20 | 1.001 | 50.0% | +6 | -85 | — | 49.4% | -0.10 | 2–7 (22%) | 3–3 (50%) | 93.8 | +1.35 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1817 | 150.2 | +4.37 | +0.73 | 1.111 | 52.1% | +26 | -300 | +80 | 54.5% | +0.58 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–5 (50%) | 93.7 | -0.82 | 2015 | 1628 | 130.3 | -1.32 | +2.13 | 0.984 | 49.7% | -36 | -94 | +134 | 48.4% | -0.22 | 6–11 (35%) | 9–6 (60%) | 98.2 | -0.47 |
| 28 | 2019 | 1929 | 148.1 | +5.43 | +0.52 | 1.156 | 52.9% | -74 | -89 | +12 | 62.2% | +0.99 | 12–3 (80%) | 6–8 (43%) | 109.0 | -2.51 | 2016 | 1664 | 130.4 | +0.33 | +0.75 | 1.022 | 50.5% | -82 | -18 | +117 | 47.3% | +0.02 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.5 | -1.29 |
| 29 | 2020 | 1828 | 136.4 | +4.38 | -1.78 | 1.131 | 51.1% | -18 | -16 | — | 50.0% | +0.16 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 95.7 | +0.30 | 2017 | 1638 | 116.2 | +0.03 | -0.71 | 0.940 | 49.2% | -88 | -17 | +149 | 44.7% | -0.37 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–1 | — | -0.52 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1821 | 131.5 | +2.33 | -1.69 | 1.003 | 50.1% | -28 | -46 | +285 | 54.1% | +0.30 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.9 | +0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1713 | 134.0 | +3.11 | +2.53 | 1.245 | 54.3% | -59 | — | — | 70.6% | +1.23 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.15 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1691 | 123.6 | -1.78 | -0.45 | 0.800 | 45.6% | +6 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | -0.94 |
| Career | — | 2020 | 150.1 | +4.68 | +0.72 | 1.142 | 52.4% | +5 | -193 | +18 | 59.0% | +0.73 | 44–47 (48%) | 38–36 (51%) | 98.3 | -0.72 | — | 1774 | 133.8 | -0.16 | +0.34 | 0.971 | 49.4% | -36 | -26 | +128 | 45.1% | -0.37 | 40–76 (34%) | 49–40 (55%) | 96.5 | -1.60 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 6 | 1 | 7 | Aug 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 4, 2019 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 28, 2021 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 2 | 10 | 12 | Jan 18, 2017 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 2 | 7 | 9 | Aug 27, 2015 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 1 | 6 | 7 | Feb 4, 2021 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jun 17, 2017 | H2H |
| Barbora Strycova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 18, 2016 | H2H |