H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Johanna Larsson vs Kateryna Baindl H2H: 1-2
Kateryna Baindl holds a 2–1 lead over Johanna Larsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kateryna Baindl leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kateryna Baindl won the 2019 Budapest third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2019* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kateryna Baindl | 6-1 6-1 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2016* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Johanna Larsson | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2016* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Kateryna Baindl | 7-6(3) 3-2 (ret.) | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Larsson | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |