H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Johanna Larsson vs Kurumi Nara H2H: 1-1
Johanna Larsson and Kurumi Nara are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Johanna Larsson won the 2018 Auckland third round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2018 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 6-4 7-6(3) | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2018* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Johanna Larsson | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2015* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Larsson | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |