H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Johanna Larsson vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-0
Johanna Larsson holds a 1–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johanna Larsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Johanna Larsson won the 2016 Istanbul third round 6-2 2-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2016* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Johanna Larsson | 6-2 2-6 7-6(5) | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Johanna Larsson | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |